Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development.

We evaluated a virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy simulator using a standardized skills-assessment algorithm in 3 specific groups with various degrees of surgical expertise. The simulator (Mentice Corp, Gothenberg, Sweden) consists of a computer-based, dual-force feedback system with video monitor. Modeled structures include cartilage, labrum, ligaments, biceps tendon, and rotator cuff. The study included 3 groups of volunteers: group 1, medical students interviewing for orthopaedic residency (n = 35); group 2, orthopaedic residents interviewing for sports medicine fellowship (n = 22); and group 3, experienced faculty at a shoulder surgery course (n = 21). Data were collected anonymously and subjects completed a standardized test protocol designed to assess accuracy and efficiency. Subjects used the probe to "touch" a sphere that appeared at various locations within the joint (11 positions total). The sphere changed location immediately on contact with the tip of the probe. The following parameters were calculated by the computer: time (from touching the first ball until touching the eleventh ball), path ratio (percent of measured path length relative to the ideal path), collisions (number of times the probe / arthroscope contacted any tissue), and injuries (collisions beyond a threshold force). Test time and path ratio differed significantly as a function of surgical experience. There was no significant difference in probe collisions between the groups. Arthroscope collisions and injuries averaged 2 or less in all of the groups. There was significant correlation between path ratio and time to complete the test in groups 1 and 2 (r =.527 and r =.827, respectively, P <.001), but not in group 3 (r =.376, P =.10). There was essentially normal distribution of time performance in groups 1 and 2. Time was shorter and more consistent in group 3, suggesting greater consistency in the experienced surgeons. These data suggest that this arthroscopy simulator facilitates discrimination of arthroscopic skills. Computer-based simulation technology provides a major opportunity for surgical skills development without morbidity and operating room inefficiency.

[1]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Virtual reality: teaching tool of the twenty‐first century? , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  B. McLellan,et al.  Early experience with simulated trauma resuscitation. , 1999, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[3]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[4]  M. Tuggy,et al.  Virtual Reality Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Simulator Training: Impact on Resident Performance , 1998, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[5]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[6]  D A Rogers,et al.  A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[7]  Howard A. Schwid,et al.  Anesthesia and critical care simulators , 1995 .

[8]  J. Grosfeld,et al.  Presidential Address. Visions: medical education and surgical training in evolution. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[9]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science , 1991 .

[10]  Matthew B. Weinger,et al.  An Objective Methodology for Task Analysis and Workload Assessment in Anesthesia Providers , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[11]  R. Reznick,et al.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[12]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Development of virtual environments for training skills and reducing errors in laparoscopic surgery , 1998, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[13]  A Darzi,et al.  Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  M. Bro-Nielsen,et al.  VR simulation of abdominal trauma surgery. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  M Ahmed,et al.  Virtual reality in medicine. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[16]  James A. Farmer,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Helping Adults Learn. , 1993 .

[17]  Allan Collins,et al.  Debating the Situation: A Rejoinder to Palincsar and Wineburg , 1989 .

[18]  Richard M. Satava,et al.  Cybersurgery: Advanced Technologies for Surgical Practice , 1997 .

[19]  D. E. Burt,et al.  Virtual reality in anaesthesia. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Professionals' Ways of Knowing: New Findings on How to Improve Professional Education , 1992 .

[21]  J Spierdijk,et al.  Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance? , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching and testing technical skills. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[23]  R H Choplin,et al.  Virtual Bronchoscopy: Relationships of Virtual Reality Endobronchial Simulations to Actual Bronchoscopic Findings , 1996 .

[24]  James A. Farmer,et al.  Cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for continuing professional education , 1992 .

[25]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[26]  T. Krummel,et al.  Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education: real or unreal? , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[27]  R B Loftin,et al.  Assessing a virtual reality surgical skills simulator. , 1996, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[28]  M. Bridges,et al.  The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[29]  Daniele D. Flannery Applying cognitive learning theory to adult learning , 1993 .

[30]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .