Mechanochemical manipulation of hepatocyte aggregation can selectively induce or repress liver-specific function.

Controlled activation of hepatocyte aggregation is critical to three-dimensional (3D) multicellular morphogenesis during native regeneration of liver as well as tissue reconstruction therapies. In this work, we quantify the stimulatory effects of two model hepatotrophic activators, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), on the aggregation kinetics and liver-specific function of hepatocytes cultured on organotypic substrates with differing mechanical resistivity. Substrate-specific morphogenesis of cultured hepatocytes is induced on a tissue basement membrane extract, Matrigel, formulated at two distinct levels of mechanical compliance (storage modulus G', at oscillatory shear rate 1 rad/s, was 34 Pa for basal Matrigel and 118 Pa for crosslinked Matrigel). Overall, we report that growth factor stimulation selectively promotes the kinetics of aggregation in the form of two-dimensional corded aggregates on basal Matrigel and three-dimensional spheroidal aggregates on crosslinked Matrigel. Our analysis also indicates that costimulation with EGF and HGF (20 ng/mL each) cooperatively maximizes the kinetics of aggregation in a substrate-specific manner. In addition, we show that the role of growth factor stimulation on hepatocyte function is sensitively governed by the mechanical compliance of the substrate. In particular, on matrices with high compliance, costimulatory aggregation is shown to elicit a marked increase in albumin secretion rate, whereas on matrices with low compliance aggregation results in effective functional repression to basal, unstimulated levels. Thus, our studies highlight a novel interplay of physicochemical parameters of the culture microenvironment, leading to selective enhancement or repression of differentiated functions of hepatocytes, in concert with the activation of cellular morphogenesis.

[1]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Assessment of Artificial Liver Support Technology , 1992, Cell transplantation.

[2]  R Langer,et al.  Selective cell transplantation using bioabsorbable artificial polymers as matrices. , 1988, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  N. Marceau,et al.  Spheroidal aggregate culture of rat liver cells: histotypic reorganization, biomatrix deposition, and maintenance of functional activities , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  K. Böker,et al.  Ultrastructural and functional differentiation of hepatocytes under long‐term culture conditions , 1995, The Anatomical record.

[5]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Structure and function of hepatocyte growth factor. , 1990, Progress in growth factor research.

[6]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Upregulation of molecular motor‐encoding genes during hepatocyte growth factor‐and epidermal growth factor‐induced cell motility , 1996, Journal of cellular physiology.

[7]  M. Toner,et al.  Effect of extracellular matrix topology on cell structure, function, and physiological responsiveness: hepatocytes cultured in a sandwich configuration , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  C. I. Pogson,et al.  The mitogenic response to EGF of rat hepatocytes cultured on laminin-rich gels (EHS) is blocked downstream of receptor tyrosine-phosphorylation. , 1996, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  D. Ingber EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX, CELLULAR MECHANICS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING , 1993 .

[10]  G. Michalopoulos,et al.  Characterization of the effects of human placental HGF on rat hepatocytes , 1992, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[12]  R Langer,et al.  Localized delivery of epidermal growth factor improves the survival of transplanted hepatocytes , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  D. Stolz,et al.  Comparative effects of hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor on motility, morphology, mitogenesis, and signal transduction of primary rat hepatocytes , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[14]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Culture matrix configuration and composition in the maintenance of hepatocyte polarity and function. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[15]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Matrix-Induced Liver Cell Aggregates (MILCA) for Bioartificial Liver Use , 1996, The International journal of artificial organs.

[16]  A. Ben-Ze'ev,et al.  Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions differentially regulate the expression of hepatic and cytoskeletal genes in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Cell-cell interactions are essential for maintenance of hepatocyte function in collagen gel but not on matrigel. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  Cell density-dependent regulation of albumin synthesis and DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes by hepatocyte growth factor. , 1992, Journal of biochemistry.

[19]  M. Powers,et al.  Motility behavior of hepatocytes on extracellular matrix substrata during aggregation , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  F. Cerra,et al.  Enhanced Morphology and Function in Hepatocyte Spheroids: A Model of Tissue Self-Assembly , 1998 .

[21]  R. Ezzell,et al.  Hepatocyte Aggregation and Reorganization of EHS Matrix Gel , 1997 .

[22]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell-substratum adhesion strength as a determinant of hepatocyte aggregate morphology. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  M. Zilliox,et al.  Efficient assembly of rat hepatocyte spheroids for tissue engineering applications , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[25]  D. Jackson,et al.  The extracellular matrix coordinately modulates liver transcription factors and hepatocyte morphology , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[26]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  Regulation of cell growth and motility by hepatocyte growth factor and receptor expression in various cell species. , 1992, Experimental cell research.

[27]  S. Farmer,et al.  Effects of Extracellular Matrix on Hepatocyte Growth and Gene Expression: Implications for Hepatic Regeneration and the Repair of Liver Injury , 1990, Seminars in liver disease.

[28]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Hepatocyte function and extracellular matrix geometry: long‐term culture in a sandwich configuration , 1989, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[29]  M. Becich,et al.  Comparative analysis of mitogenic and morphogenic effects of HGF and EGF on rat and human hepatocytes maintained in collagen gels , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[30]  M. Peshwa,et al.  Kinetics of Hepatocyte Spheroid Formation , 1994 .

[31]  E. Schuetz,et al.  Hepatocellular phenotype in Vitro is influenced by biophysical features of the collagenous substratum , 1991, Hepatology.

[32]  D. Stolz,et al.  Synergistic enhancement of EGF, but not HGF, stimulated hepatocyte motility by TGF‐β1 in vitro , 1997, Journal of cellular physiology.

[33]  K. Ishimura,et al.  Importance of cell aggregation for expression of liver functions and regeneration demonstrated with primary cultured hepatocytes , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[34]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Cell density-dependent mitogenic effect and -independent cellular handling of epidermal growth factor in primary cultured rat hepatocytes. , 1997, Journal of hepatology.