Accuracy and Reliability of the Kinect Version 2 for Clinical Measurement of Motor Function

Background The introduction of low cost optical 3D motion tracking sensors provides new options for effective quantification of motor dysfunction. Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the Kinect V2 sensor against a gold standard motion capture system with respect to accuracy of tracked landmark movements and accuracy and repeatability of derived clinical parameters. Methods Nineteen healthy subjects were concurrently recorded with a Kinect V2 sensor and an optical motion tracking system (Vicon). Six different movement tasks were recorded with 3D full-body kinematics from both systems. Tasks included walking in different conditions, balance and adaptive postural control. After temporal and spatial alignment, agreement of movements signals was described by Pearson’s correlation coefficient and signal to noise ratios per dimension. From these movement signals, 45 clinical parameters were calculated, including ranges of motions, torso sway, movement velocities and cadence. Accuracy of parameters was described as absolute agreement, consistency agreement and limits of agreement. Intra-session reliability of 3 to 5 measurement repetitions was described as repeatability coefficient and standard error of measurement for each system. Results Accuracy of Kinect V2 landmark movements was moderate to excellent and depended on movement dimension, landmark location and performed task. Signal to noise ratio provided information about Kinect V2 landmark stability and indicated larger noise behaviour in feet and ankles. Most of the derived clinical parameters showed good to excellent absolute agreement (30 parameters showed ICC(3,1) > 0.7) and consistency (38 parameters showed r > 0.7) between both systems. Conclusion Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to established marker- or wearable sensor based system. The Kinect V2 has the potential to be used as a reliable and valid clinical measurement tool.

[1]  Ruigang Yang,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of joint angles measured using a single camera markerless motion capture system. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Friedemann Paul,et al.  Using perceptive computing in multiple sclerosis - the Short Maximum Speed Walk test , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Raymond W. McGorry,et al.  The validity of the first and second generation Microsoft Kinect™ for identifying joint center locations during static postures. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Bernd Heinlein,et al.  Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[5]  Martin Plonus Electronics and communications for scientists and engineers , 2001 .

[6]  P. Olivier,et al.  Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[7]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[9]  Alexandra Pfister,et al.  Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis , 2014, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  D. Heldman,et al.  Clinician versus machine: reliability and responsiveness of motor endpoints in Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[11]  Jonathan Stein,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Computer Science Perspective , 2000 .

[12]  Amee L. Seitz,et al.  Validity and reliability of Kinect skeleton for measuring shoulder joint angles: a feasibility study. , 2015, Physiotherapy.

[13]  Kang B. Lee,et al.  Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Melvyn Roerdink,et al.  Kinematic Validation of a Multi-Kinect v2 Instrumented 10-Meter Walkway for Quantitative Gait Assessments , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  F. Horak,et al.  Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[16]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Victor Sholukha,et al.  Determination of repeatability of kinect sensor. , 2014, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[18]  Friedemann Paul,et al.  Validity of visual perceptive computing for static posturography in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[19]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[20]  Kang Lee,et al.  IEEE 1588 standard for a precision clock synchronization protocol for networked measurement and control systems , 2002, 2nd ISA/IEEE Sensors for Industry Conference,.

[21]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Evaluation of Pose Tracking Accuracy in the First and Second Generations of Microsoft Kinect , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.

[22]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  Winson C.C. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. , 2014, Gait & posture.