Conflict management and performance of information technology development teams

Purpose This research aims to investigate how team support and cohesion channel the effects of relationship conflict and its management on team productivity. Design/methodology/approach Questionnaire data were sampled from students working in groups to design software systems for companies. Structural equation methodology was used to estimate the proposed model. Findings The results indicate that the mediators (team support and cohesion) positively affect each other and team performance. The results support that the effects of conflict and conflict management on team performance are mediated by team support first and then indirectly through team cohesion. Research limitations/implications This paper empirically establishes the mechanisms through which conflict and its management affect team performance. The following limitations should be considered when generalizing the results of the study: team-level phenomena were assessed using perceived measures of individual team members and an academic setting was used for data collection. Practical implications The findings indicate that team support plays an important role in protecting the team from the negative effects of conflict and that team support contributes to the development of team cohesion. Originality/value This work is one of the first to evaluate the mechanisms of team support and cohesion through which team conflict and its management affect team performance.

[1]  Jessica Katz Jameson,et al.  EMOTION IN CONFLICT FORMATION AND ITS TRANSFORMATION: APPLICATION TO ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[2]  A. Somech,et al.  Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification , 2009 .

[3]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[4]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  E. Mannix,et al.  The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Jia‐Chi Huang,et al.  Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict: The moderating role of team goal orientation and conflict management , 2010 .

[7]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[8]  M. Sobel.  Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[9]  Anne Powell,et al.  Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[10]  P. Burke,et al.  Identity theory and social identity theory , 2000 .

[11]  Paul S. Hempel,et al.  Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China , 2009 .

[12]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[13]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[14]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Further thoughts on the validity of measures of elation, gladness, and joy , 1991 .

[15]  Anthony T. Cobb,et al.  Understanding the connections between relationship conflict and performance: The intervening roles of trust and exchange , 2010 .

[16]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[17]  Hyejung Lee,et al.  Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service , 2014, Inf. Technol. People.

[18]  A. Somech,et al.  Team heterogeneity and its relationship with team support and team effectiveness , 2002 .

[19]  Narda R. Quigley,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness , 2009 .

[20]  Folger.  Working Through Conflict , 2017, Working Through Conflict.

[21]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Dina L. Denham,et al.  Disputant Reactions to Managerial Conflict Resolution Tactics , 1999, Group & Organization Management.

[23]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[24]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[25]  Francisco J. Martínez-López,et al.  Causal Modeling in Marketing , 2015 .

[26]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[27]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[28]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China , 2003 .

[29]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS , 2000 .

[30]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[31]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Group‐level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups , 2009 .

[33]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[35]  M. Hogg,et al.  A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory , 1995 .

[36]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[37]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[38]  Andrew Ward,et al.  Improving the Performance of Top Management Teams , 2007 .

[39]  Anat Drach-Zahavy,et al.  Exploring Team Support: The Role of Team's Design, Values, and Leader's Support , 2004 .

[40]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[41]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[42]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[43]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory: NY. , 1978 .

[44]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[45]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Multicultural Groups , 1992 .

[46]  K. W. Mossholder,et al.  Relationships between Bases of Power and Work Reactions: The Mediational Role of Procedural Justice , 1998 .

[47]  Robert Weinberg,et al.  A Multidimensional Group Cohesion Instrument for Intercollegiate Basketball Teams , 1984 .

[48]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .