The scope of computer program protection after SAS: are we closer to answers?
暂无分享,去创建一个
*E.I.P.R. 565 In a much awaited decision, the Court of Justice held that the functionalities of a computer program, including data files and programming languages, generally cannot be protected by copyright. Interfaces can be protected only the extent that they represent the author's creative choices. The court's decision on arti.5(3) of the software directive is more cryptic but probably can be interpreted to mean that the owner of the copyright in a computer program may not prevent a licensee from determining the ideas and principles which underlie the elements of the program so long as the user does not infringe the copyright owner's exclusive rights.
[1] Pamela Samuelson,et al. Does Copyright Protection Under the EU Software Directive Extend to Computer Program Behaviour, Languages and Interfaces? , 2011 .
[2] Daniel J. Gervais,et al. The TRIPS agreement: Drafting history and analysis , 1998 .
[3] Eleonora Rosati. Originality in a Work, or a Work of Originality: The effects of the infopaq decision , 2013 .
[4] Daniel J. Gervais,et al. Feist Goes Global: A Comparative Analysis Of The Notion Of Originality In Copyright Law , 2005 .