Research Article Electronic Media Variety and Virtual Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Task Complexity Coping Mechanisms

Research problem: Much of the research on electronic communication media so far has been characterized by a focus on the impact that specific media may have on individuals and teams, as opposed to the impact that multiple media, when used in combination, may have on individuals and teams. Research questions: (1) Does a high degree of media variety facilitate the implementation of team mechanisms for coping with task complexity? (2) Does the degree of implementation of team mechanisms for coping with task complexity positively influence team performance? Literature review: Based on a focused literature review, we develop a new set of propositions relating media variety and team performance, which we tested in the context of teams engaged in new product development. Methodology: Data from 290 new product development teams in 66 organizations located in the Northeastern US were analyzed through partial least squares-based structural equation modeling. The analysis was conducted with the software WarpPLS 2.0. Results and discussion: The results of the analysis suggest that a high degree of electronic communication media variety facilitates the implementation of task complexity coping mechanisms, such as coordination activities, in new product development teams. This, in turn, seems to lead to significant gains in team efficiency and effectiveness in those teams. The results also suggest that while electronic communication media variety plays an important facilitation role, by facilitating coordination activities, it has a much less pronounced direct effect on team efficiency and effectiveness. In other words, in the absence of task complexity coping mechanisms, such as coordination activities, a high degree of media variety may not be very useful for teams carrying out complex tasks such as new product development.

[1]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[2]  John R. Carlson.  Channel expansion theory: A dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions , 1994 .

[3]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Breaking the rules: success and failure in groupware-supported business process reengineering , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[5]  P. Diaconis,et al.  Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistics , 1983 .

[6]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[8]  Dov Te 'eni.  : A COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION FOR DESIGNING IT , 2001 .

[9]  John Mingers,et al.  A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[11]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Web 2.0 according to Wikipedia: Capturing an organizing vision , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[13]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[15]  Sean Cox,et al.  A Semantic e-Collaboration Approach to Enable Awareness in Globally Distributed Organizations , 2011, Int. J. e Collab..

[16]  Ramiro and,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000 .

[17]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[19]  Ned Kock,et al.  Information Systems Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Review and Theory Integration Framework , 2009, MIS Q..

[20]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[21]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Fast timing estimation for CDMA waveforms in a near-far environment , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[22]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies , 1997 .

[23]  Harold Kerzner,et al.  Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance , 2011 .

[24]  Cengiz Yilmaz,et al.  Learning Process in New Product Development Teams and Effects on Product Success: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective , 2006 .

[25]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  Searching for Knowledge in the Pmbok® Guide , 2006 .

[26]  Ned Kock,et al.  Using WarpPLS in E-collaboration Studies: An Overview of Five Main Analysis Steps , 2010, Int. J. e Collab..

[27]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[28]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Discourse‐based technology support for intercultural communication in multinationals , 2008 .

[29]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[30]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[31]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[32]  France Bélanger,et al.  Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals , 2006 .

[33]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Jeanine Warisse Turner,et al.  Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages? , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[36]  Dragan Z. Milosevic,et al.  Impact of Project Management Standardization on Project Effectiveness , 2001 .

[37]  Lara Keane,et al.  Media , 2006, Your Baby's First Year.

[38]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Explanation in Information Systems , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[40]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Logic of Scientific Discovery: How Physical Induction Affects What Is Computable , 2014 .

[41]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[42]  Ned Kock,et al.  Team adaptation to electronic communication media: evidence of compensatory adaptation in new product development teams , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[44]  Vicki R. McKinney,et al.  Maintaining distributed relationships , 2006, CACM.

[45]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[46]  R. Goldsmith.  Blockbusters: The Five Keys to Developing Great New Products , 2004 .

[47]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[48]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  Factor analysis : limitations and alternatives , 1976 .

[49]  Jianfeng Wang,et al.  An Exploratory Study of How Technology Supports Communication in Multilingual Groups , 2011, Int. J. e Collab..

[50]  B. Thompson.  Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications , 2004 .

[51]  U. Yeliz Eseryel,et al.  The Role of Face-to-Face Meetings in Technology-Supported Self-Organizing Distributed Teams , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[52]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[53]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[54]  Lynne Wainfan,et al.  Challenges in Virtual Collaboration: Videoconferencing Audioconferencing and Computer--Mediated Communications , 2005 .

[55]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[56]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[57]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[58]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[59]  A. Diamantopoulos.  Viewpoint – Export performance measurement: reflective versus formative indicators , 1999 .

[60]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[61]  Ned Kock,et al.  Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: an action research investigation of electronic communication in process improvement groups , 2001 .

[62]  Herman Wold,et al.  Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction , 1982 .

[63]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[64]  France Bélanger,et al.  Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[65]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[66]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[67]  Tabitha L. James,et al.  A Study of Communication and Coordination in Collaborative Software Development , 2006 .

[68]  Douglas J. Ayers,et al.  Integration And New Product Development Success: The Role Of Formal And Informal Controls , 2011 .

[69]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[70]  Philip Powell,et al.  Encyclopedia of E-collaboration , 2006 .

[71]  Andrew F. Simon.  Computer-Mediated Communication: Task Performance and Satisfaction , 2006, The Journal of social psychology.

[72]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[74]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[75]  Gary S. Lynn,et al.  New Product Team Learning: Developing and Profiting from Your Knowledge Capital , 1998 .

[76]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[77]  A. Stinchcombe.  Constructing Social Theories , 1970 .

[78]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[79]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[80]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[81]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[82]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[83]  G. Hancock,et al.  Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[84]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[85]  Gary Baker,et al.  The Effects of Synchronous Collaborative Technologies on Decision Making: A Study of Virtual Teams , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[86]  Mary-Beth France Watson-Manheim,et al.  Support for Communication-Based Work Processes in Virtual Work , 2002 .

[87]  Ned Kock,et al.  Systems Analysis & Design Fundamentals: A Business Process Redesign Approach , 2006 .

[88]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[89]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: a new research methodology for exploring an information economy , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[90]  David G. Schwartz,et al.  The process of organizational communication: a model and field study , 2001 .

[91]  Ned Kock,et al.  Media naturalness and compensatory encoding: The burden of electronic media obstacles is on senders , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[92]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[93]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[94]  G. Fasano,et al.  A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test , 1987 .