Exploring Microsimulation methodologies for the estimation of household attributes

Microsimulation is a rapidly expanding area of spatial modelling, which seems to offer great potential for applied policy analysis. However, currently there is considerable debate on the most appropriate methodology for estimating micro-data. Household or individual attribute data can be represented both as lists and/or as tabulations. It has long been argued (Birkin and Clarke, 1995; Clarke, 1996; Williamson et al, 1998) that the representation of information on households and individuals in the form of lists offers greater efficiency of storage and spatial flexibility as well as an ability to update and forecast. This paper reviews the possibilities and methodologies of building list-based population micro-data for small areas. First, it evaluates the methods, which have been developed and employed so far for the estimation of population micro-data, outlining the advantages and drawbacks of each one of them. Then the paper investigates the comparison of methods for generating conditional probabilities by statistical matching techniques or by using probabilities directly from household data sets such as the Samples of Anonymised Records (SARs) and the Small Area Statistics (SAS) from the UK Census of population. In addition, it explores the combination of these methods in a microsimulation framework and presents micro-data outputs from a local labour market microsimulation model for Leeds. Finally, it highlights the difficulties of calibrating this kind of model and of validating the model outputs, given the absence of suitable observed statistics.

[1]  P H Rees,et al.  The Estimation of Population Microdata by Using Data from Small Area Statistics and Samples of Anonymised Records , 1998, Environment & planning A.

[2]  David Flanagan,et al.  Java in a Nutshell , 1996 .

[3]  Martin Clarke,et al.  Synthesis—A Synthetic Spatial Information System for Urban and Regional Analysis: Methods and Examples , 1988 .

[4]  C. Reeves.  Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[5]  J. Hills.  The Future of Welfare: A Guide to the Debate , 1993 .

[6]  Martin Clarke,et al.  MICROSIMULATION METHODS IN SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND PLANNING , 1987 .

[7]  Joseph O'Neil.  Teach Yourself Java , 1990 .

[8]  D. Hill.  Citizens and cities: urban policy in the 1990s , 1994 .

[9]  Joachim Merz,et al.  Microanalytic simulation models to support social and financial policy , 1986 .

[10]  Paul Norman,et al.  Putting Iterative Proportional Fitting on the researcher’s desk , 1999 .

[11]  Norman Johnson.  Reconstructing the welfare state: A decade of change, 1980-1990 , 1990 .

[12]  S. Fienberg.  An Iterative Procedure for Estimation in Contingency Tables , 1970 .

[13]  J. Sachs,et al.  The geography of poverty and wealth. , 2001, Scientific American.

[14]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  The Reliability of Using the Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedure , 1992 .

[15]  P Rees,et al.  Estimating and projecting the populations of urban communities. , 1994, Environment & planning A.

[16]  Laura Lemay,et al.  Teach Yourself Java in 21 Days , 1996 .

[17]  H. Williams,et al.  Vacancy Chain Models for Housing and Employment Systems , 1986 .

[18]  J. Edwards.  Social Policy and the City: A Review of Recent Policy Developments and Literature , 1995 .

[19]  C. Marsh,et al.  The sample of anonymised records. , 1991, ESRC Data Archive bulletin.

[20]  Michael Wegener,et al.  Integrated Forecasting Models of Urban and Regional Systems , 1986 .

[21]  C. Marsh,et al.  Samples of anonymised records from the 1991 census. , 1992 .

[22]  Philip Rees,et al.  Population structures and models : developments in spatial demography , 1986 .

[23]  Joachim Merz,et al.  Microsimulation -- A survey of principles, developments and applications , 1991 .

[24]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Census users' handbook , 1995 .

[25]  Martin Clarke,et al.  The Generation of Individual and Household Incomes at the Small Area Level using Synthesis , 1989 .