Product mix decisions and production lot sizes

According to the earlier research related to the product mix decisions, the approach called throughput accounting seems to provide much better results than conventional management accounting. However, all the examples so far have assumed that cycle times in used resources are not dependent on any other variable. In practice, the situation is not so simplified; the decisions related to production lot sizes will affect the cycle time requirement of a product in a particular resource, and, in the case of capacity constraint, the product's and system's profitability. The main cause for this is the setup time in a particular resource. As can be concluded from the results of this paper, the appropriate lot sizing decisions will enable system to produce more with its existing resources and therefore increase its profits significantly. As the performed sensitivity analysis suggests, the differences between traditional management accounting and throughput accounting will become increasingly insignificant after lot sizes have been somewhat increased. According to shown results it is being suggested that lot sizing decisions are rather important for the profitability of manufacturing unit, and especially in capacity constraint resource(s) the use of smaller lot sizes should be avoided.

[1]  David Dugdale,et al.  THROUGHPUT ACCOUNTING: TRANSFORMING PRACTICES? , 1998 .

[2]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Improving the electronics manufacturing response in an assembly-to-order environment , 2003, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Constraint batch sizing in a lean environment , 2001 .

[4]  Donald Erlenkotter,et al.  Ford Whitman Harris and the Economic Order Quantity Model , 1990, Oper. Res..

[5]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Management accounting (1984-1994): development of new practice and theory , 1994 .

[6]  Gerhard Plenert,et al.  Optimizing theory of constraints when multiple constrained resources exist , 1993 .

[7]  V. Selladurai,et al.  Optimum production schedule and profit maximisation using the concept: theory of constraints , 2003, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[8]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola Theory of constraints and outsourcing decisions , 2001, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Eliyahu M. Goldratt,et al.  The theory of constraints and its implications for management accounting , 1995 .

[10]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[11]  Lawrence D. Fredendall,et al.  The impact of management accounting, product structure, product mix algorithm, and planning horizon on manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[12]  Jeff Cox,et al.  The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement , 1984 .

[13]  Ford W. Harris,et al.  How Many Parts to Make at Once , 1990, Oper. Res..

[14]  James F. Cox,et al.  Constraint‐based accounting and its impact on organizational performance: a simulation of four common business strategies , 2002 .

[15]  S. S. Chakravorty,et al.  Using the theory of constraints to guide the implementation of quality improvement projects in manufacturing operations , 1995 .

[16]  George J. Staubus Activity costing and input-output accounting , 1971 .