Visual imagery can impede reasoning

Although it is natural to suppose that visual mental imagery is important in human deductive reasoning, the evidence is equivocal. This article argues that reasoning studies have not distinguished between ease of visualization and ease of constructing spatial models. Rating studies show that these factors can be separated. Their results yielded four sorts of relations: (1)visuospatial relations that are easy to envisage visually and spatially, (2)visual relations that are easy to envisage visually but hard to envisage spatially, (3)spatial relations that are hard to envisage visually but easy to envisage spatially, and (4)control relations that are hard to envisage both visually and spatially. Three experiments showed that visual relations slow down the process of reasoning in comparison with control relations, whereas visuospatial and spatial relations yield inferences comparable with those of control relations. We conclude that irrelevant visual detail can be a nuisance in reasoning and can impede the process.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  S. Handel,et al.  Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. , 1968 .

[4]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[5]  G. R. Potts,et al.  The internal representation of a three-term series problem , 1975 .

[6]  P. Shaver,et al.  Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving , 1975, Cognition.

[7]  A. Paivio.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[8]  B. T. Mynatt,et al.  Constructive Processes in Linear Order Problems Revealed by Sentence Study Times. , 1977 .

[9]  R. Sternberg.  Representation and Process in Linear Syllogistic Reasoning. , 1980 .

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[11]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and mind , 1982 .

[12]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[13]  D. Egan,et al.  Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[14]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[15]  R. Weale.  Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[16]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[17]  Channel Four,et al.  ‘The Inner Eye’ , 2021, Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye.

[18]  C. Clement,et al.  Logical reasoning, world knowledge, and mental imagery: Interconnections in cognitive processes , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[19]  P. Pollard,et al.  Response bias in relational reasoning , 1986 .

[20]  H. Damasio,et al.  Dissociable visual and spatial impairments following right posterior cerebral lesions: Clinical, neuropsychological and anatomical evidence , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Richardson.  The role of mental imagery in models of transitive inference , 1987 .

[22]  Visuo-spatial working memory , 1988 .

[23]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification. , 1989 .

[24]  R. Finke,et al.  Principles of mental imagery , 1989 .

[25]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Why are What and Where Processed by Separate Cortical Visual Systems? A Computational Investigation , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Shott,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[27]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual Mental Imagery Activates Topographically Organized Visual Cortex: PET Investigations , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[29]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain , 1994 .

[30]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof , 1994 .

[31]  O Levrier,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T during sensorimotor and cognitive task. , 1995, European neurology.

[32]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Functional Brain Imaging Studies of Cortical Mechanisms for Memory , 1995, Science.

[34]  W. Orrison,et al.  Functional Brain Imaging , 1995 .

[35]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Knauff,et al.  Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen's calculus , 1995 .

[37]  J. Meyer,et al.  Functional brain imaging. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[38]  Explaining preferred mental models in Allen inferences with a metrical model of imagery , 1996 .

[39]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  D. Pearson,et al.  The Inner Eye and the Inner Scribe of Visuo-spatial Working Memory: Evidence from Developmental Fractionation , 1997 .

[41]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural Systems Shared by Visual Imagery and Visual Perception: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[42]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: a test of the mental model theory , 1997, Cognition.

[43]  K. C. Klauer.  Working Memory Involvement in Propositional and Spatial Reasoning , 1997 .

[44]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Imagery, Visualization, and Thinking , 1998 .

[46]  Christoph Schlieder,et al.  Mental Models in Spatial Reasoning , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[47]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Perception and cognition at century's end , 1998 .

[48]  D. Osherson,et al.  Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  C. Freksa,et al.  Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge , 1998 .

[50]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. , 1999, Science.

[51]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Representation and process , 1999 .

[52]  Markus Knauff,et al.  The cognitive adequacy of Allen's interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[53]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Verbal Representations and Spatial Manipulation During Mental Synthesis , 1999 .

[54]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by functional MRI , 2000 .

[55]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by fMRI , 2000, Neuroreport.

[56]  Gerhard Strube,et al.  Spatial Reasoning: No Need for Visual Information , 2001, COSIT.

[57]  R. Dolan,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. , 2002, Psychological review.

[60]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.