A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Klaas Postema | Jan H B Geertzen | Harmen van der Linde | Cheriel J Hofstad | Alexander C H Geurts | Jacques van Limbeek | A. Geurts | J. van Limbeek | K. Postema | C. Hofstad | J. Geertzen | H. van der Linde
[2] J. Czerniecki,et al. EFFECT OF ALTERATIONS IN PROSTHETIC SHANK MASS ON THE METABOLIC COSTS OF AMBULATION IN ABOVE-KNEE AMPUTEES , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[3] E. Ayyappa,et al. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[4] Y L Chou,et al. Gait analysis and energy consumption of below-knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet. , 2000, Gait & posture.
[5] P J Corcoran,et al. Energy expenditure of ambulation in patients with above-knee amputations. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[6] W C Flowers,et al. Stance phase control of above-knee prostheses: knee control versus SACH foot design. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.
[7] G. Street,et al. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[8] Donald G. Shurr,et al. Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot™ Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot , 1991 .
[9] R B Stein,et al. IMPROVED ANKLE‐FOOT SYSTEM FOR ABOVE‐KNEE AMPUTEES , 1986, American journal of physical medicine.
[10] A L Hof,et al. Comparison of gait using a Multiflex foot versus a Quantum foot in knee disarticulation amputees , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[11] C M Godfrey,et al. Foot mass effect on gait in the prosthetic limb. , 1977, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[12] J. Lehmann,et al. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[13] P. E. Martin,et al. Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral transtibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[14] D A Winter,et al. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[15] A. E. Chapman,et al. Prostheses alignment: effect on gait of persons with below-knee amputations. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[16] S A Hale,et al. Analysis of the swing phase dynamics and muscular effort of the above-knee amputee for varying prosthetic shank loads , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[17] J. Perry,et al. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[19] A K Dasgupta,et al. The performance of the ICEROSS prostheses amongst transtibial amputees with a special reference to the workplace--a preliminary study. Icelandic Roll on Silicone Socket. , 1997, Occupational medicine.
[20] S J Sheredos,et al. Report on the evaluation of the VA/Seattle below-knee prosthesis. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[21] H. Hermens,et al. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[22] J B Bussmann,et al. Effects of prosthetic mass and mass distribution on kinematics and energetics of prosthetic gait: a systematic review. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[23] D J Sanderson,et al. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[24] P. Kohler,et al. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[25] H J Yack,et al. Physiological measurements of walking and running in people with transtibial amputations with 3 different prostheses. , 1999, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.
[26] D. Barth,et al. Gait Analysis and Energy Cost of Below‐Knee Amputees Wearing Six Different Prosthetic Feet , 1992 .
[27] J. Perry,et al. The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[28] J. Grimshaw,et al. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines , 1999, BMJ.
[29] J. Didier,et al. Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[30] D Datta,et al. A pilot study comparing the cognitive demand of walking for transfemoral amputees using the Intelligent Prosthesis with that using conventionally damped knees , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.
[31] C H Daly,et al. Interface pressures and shear stresses: Sagittal plane angular alignment effects in three trans-tibial amputee case studies , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[32] J Perry,et al. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[33] H. Hermens,et al. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[34] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[35] Z Susak,et al. Energy expenditure and cardiac response in above-knee amputees while using prostheses with open and locked knee mechanisms. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.
[36] M. Nash,et al. Energy expenditure of trans-tibial amputees during ambulation at self-selected pace , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[37] S. E. Solomonidis,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet , 1984, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[38] A L Hof,et al. Gait analysis of transfemoral amputee patients using prostheses with two different knee joints. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[39] J. Czerniecki,et al. BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[40] Suction socket suspension for below-knee amputees. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[41] M. Nash,et al. The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket: A comparison of energy cost during ambulation , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[42] A Gitter,et al. INSIGHTS INTO AMPUTEE RUNNING: A Muscle Work Analysis , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[43] M. Nash,et al. The effects of prosthesis mass on metabolic cost of ambulation in non-vascular trans-tibial amputees , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[44] C. W. Radcliffe,et al. The University of California Biomechanics Laboratory four-bar polycentric knee linkage. A clinical trial in 20 active above-knee amputees. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[45] V. C. Roberts,et al. The effect of footwear mass on the gait patterns of unilateral below-knee amputees , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[46] W D Spence,et al. Energy cost of walking: comparison of "intelligent prosthesis" with conventional mechanism. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[47] T. Mulder,et al. Clinical gait analysis in a rehabilitation context: some controversial issues , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.
[48] T. Schmalz,et al. [Significance of static prosthesis alignment for standing and walking of patients with lower limb amputation]. , 2001, Der Orthopade.
[49] S G Zachariah,et al. Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.
[50] R W Wirta,et al. Analysis of below-knee suspension systems: effect on gait. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[51] E. Culham,et al. Below-Knee Amputation: A Comparison of the Effect of the Sach Foot and Single Axis Foot on Electromyographic Patterns During Locomotion , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[52] Donald G. Shurr,et al. Perception of Walking Difficulty by Below-Knee Amputees Using a Conventional Foot Versus the Flex-Foot , 1991 .
[53] T. Schmalz,et al. Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. , 2002, Gait & posture.
[54] A. Lees,et al. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[55] Steven Piantadosi,et al. Clinical Trials As Experimental Designs , 2005 .
[56] Morrison Jb,et al. Prostheses alignment: effect on gait of persons with below-knee amputations. , 1984 .
[57] T Kasahara,et al. Functional evaluation by gait analysis of various ankle-foot assemblies used by below-knee amputees , 1992, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[58] L. E. Holt,et al. A comparison of the SACH and single axis foot in the gait of unilateral below-knee amputees , 1983, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[59] Energy costs of below-knee prostheses using two types of suspension. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[60] A. Karsznia,et al. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: A comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[61] G. Cochran. A primer of orthopaedic biomechanics , 1982 .
[62] W. A. Hubbard,et al. Establishment of consistent gait after fitting of new components. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[63] E L Bontrager,et al. Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[64] J. Lehmann,et al. Mass and mass distribution of below-knee prostheses: effect on gait efficacy and self-selected walking speed. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[65] H. Vet,et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[66] J. van Limbeek,et al. An open socket technique for through-knee amputations in relation to skin problems of the stump: an explorative study , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.
[67] Murray Mp,et al. Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. , 1983 .
[68] Hannu Alaranta,et al. Practical Benefits of Flex-Foot in Below-Knee Amputees , 1991 .
[69] J. B. J. Bussmann,et al. Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[70] H. Alaranta,et al. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[71] J. Czerniecki,et al. Energy transfer mechanisms as a compensatory strategy in below knee amputee runners. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.
[72] J. D. Morrison,et al. Polyurethane gel liner usage in the Oxford Prosthetic Service , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[73] Koepke Gh,et al. Effect of liner materials on interface pressures in below-knee prostheses. , 1970 .
[74] J. Lehmann,et al. Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[75] J. Sanders,et al. Effects of alignment changes on stance phase pressures and shear stresses on transtibial amputees: measurements from 13 transducer sites. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[76] H. Stinus,et al. Biomechanik und Beurteilung des mikroprozessorgesteuerten Exoprothesenkniegelenkes C-Leg , 2000 .
[77] J. Czerniecki,et al. Effect of prosthetic mass on swing phase work during above-knee amputee ambulation. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[78] H Stinus. [Biomechanics and evaluation of the microprocessor-controlled C-Leg exoprosthesis knee joint]. , 2000, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.
[79] S B Sepic,et al. Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[80] Lang Yang. The influence of limb alignment on the gait of above-knee amputees , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.
[81] J. Czerniecki,et al. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.
[82] G H Koepke,et al. Negative pressures during swing phase in below-knee prostheses with rubber sleeve suspension. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[83] Stein Rb,et al. Improved ankle-foot system for above-knee amputees. , 1986 .
[84] D. Shurr,et al. Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .
[85] J. Perry,et al. Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[86] A M Boonstra,et al. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[87] J Perry,et al. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[88] Donald G. Shurr,et al. Mechanical Gait Analysis of Transfemoral Amputees: SACH Foot Versus the Flex-Foot , 1997 .
[89] T. Nosaka,et al. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: A comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[90] Donald G. Shurr,et al. Transfemoral Amputee Physiological Requirements: Comparisons Between SACH Foot Walking and Flex-Foot Walking , 1997 .
[91] R W Wirta,et al. Effect on gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[92] L M Bouter,et al. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. , 1997, Spine.