A nonlinear bilevel model for analysis of electric utility demand-side planning issues

An application of bilevel programming in the electric utility industry is presented. The model is nonlinear and is used to analyze various economic issues that affect electric utility planning. The electric utility at the upper level of the model seeks to minimize costs or maximize benefits while controlling electric rates and subsidizing energy conservation programs. Customers at the lower level attempt to maximize their net benefit by consuming electricity and investing in conservation. This model considers factors such as free riders and the rebound effect which affect the net benefits of utility resource plans but are ignored by most planning models. The model's solutions shed light on utility issues including whether there can be a practical difference between various objectives, including minimizing cost (“least cost” planning) and maximizing net social welfare (“value based” planning).

[1]  J. Cruz,et al.  On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero-sum games , 1973 .

[2]  David E. Boyce,et al.  A bilevel programming algorithm for exact solution of the network design problem with user-optimal flows , 1986 .

[3]  Wayne F. Bialas,et al.  On two-level optimization , 1982 .

[4]  Jeremy A. Bloom,et al.  Solving an Electricity Generating Capacity Expansion Planning Problem by Generalized Benders' Decomposition , 1983, Oper. Res..

[5]  Benjamin F. Hobbs.  The "Most Value" Test: Economic Evaluation of Electricity Demand-Side Management Considering Customer Value , 1991 .

[6]  A. Haurie,et al.  A Two-Level Systems Analysis Model of Power Cogeneration under Asymmetric Pricing , 1989, 1990 American Control Conference.

[7]  P. Sassone,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Handbook , 1978 .

[8]  L. Wiggins,et al.  Predicting conservation choice: Beyond the cost-minimization assumption , 1988 .

[9]  Analytics of demand-side conservation programs , 1989 .

[10]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs , 1960 .

[11]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  An explicit solution to the multi-level programming problem , 1982, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[13]  Assessing conservation payments: Least-cost, least-rates, or most-value? , 1989 .

[14]  J. D. Khazzoom.  Energy Saving Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances , 1987 .

[15]  G. Anandalingam.  Stackelberg Games and Multisectoral Economic Planning , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  A. Lovins.  Energy Saving from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances , 1988 .

[17]  An approach for evaluating utility-financed energy conservation programs The economic welfare model , 1985 .

[18]  P. Komor,et al.  Energy conservation behavior: a critique of the cost-minimization model, and a review of some alternative models , 1988 .

[19]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[20]  Jeremy F. Shapiro,et al.  Optimizing Resource Acquisition Decisions by Stochastic Programming , 1988 .

[21]  Richard D. Wollmer,et al.  Two stage linear programming under uncertainty with 0–1 integer first stage variables , 1980, Math. Program..

[22]  R. Turvey,et al.  Electricity Economics: Essays and Case Studies , 1977 .