The early life history stages of riverine fish: ecophysiological and environmental bottlenecks.

Fish are good indicators of the environmental health of rivers and their catchments as well as important conservation targets. Bioindication has to be based on an understanding of the requirement of characteristic species with regard to: (a). The match/mismatch between reproductive strategies and environmental conditions. (b). The niche dimensions of critical stages vis-a-vis the key conditions. (c). The availability of microhabitats along the ontogenetic niche profiles, i.e. the connectivity from spawning substrates to early life history microhabitats. The main conditions for the embryonic period are temperature and oxygen supply which are responsible for embryonic mortality, the duration of the period, and size and condition of newly-hatched larvae. For the exogenously feeding larvae the functional of food acquisition, growth and bioenergetics to temperature, food availability and current velocity is decisive. Studies concentrated on Chondrostoma nasus, a target species for monitoring and conservation in large European river systems. Results obtained in experimental studies are compared with those from field studies in order to evaluate the match/mismatch between performances and microhabitat choice and population dynamics in the field. Discrepancies between requirements and field conditions in regulated rivers underline the significance of inshore zones as microhabitats (expressed in the 'Inshore Retention Concept') and the requirement for ecophysiological studies on target species for river restoration and conservation.

[1]  L. Crowder,et al.  Larval Size and Recruitment Mechanisms in Fishes: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[2]  H. Keckeis.  Influence of river morphology and current velocity conditions on spawning site selection of Chondrostoma nasus (L.) , 2001 .

[3]  M. Reichard,et al.  Drift of larval and juvenile fishes: a comparison between small and large lowland rivers , 2001 .

[4]  K. Fausch,et al.  Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain , 1984 .

[5]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Feeding, energetic benefit and swimming capabilities of 0+ nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) in flowing water: an integrative laboratory approach , 2001 .

[6]  L. Urho.  Relationship between dispersal of larvae and nursery areas in the Baltic Sea , 1999 .

[7]  F. Schiemer.  Fish as indicators for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large rivers , 2000 .

[8]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  A Model for Responses of Vertebral Numbers in Fish to Environmental Influences During Development , 1981 .

[9]  Peter Calow,et al.  River conservation and management , 1992 .

[10]  L. Fuiman,et al.  Early Life History of Fish: An Energetics Approach , 1995 .

[11]  Food consumption and growth of larvae and juveniles of three cyprinid species at different food levels , 1992 .

[12]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Water level fluctuations as a major determinant of chironomid community structure in the inshore zone of a large temperate river , 1996 .

[13]  E. Kamler,et al.  Temperature‐induced changes of survival, development and yolk partitioning in Chondrostoma nasus , 1998 .

[14]  F. Schiemer,et al.  SPATIAL AND SEASONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF 0+ FISH NURSERY HABITATS OF NASE, CHONDROSTOMA NASUS IN THE RIVER DANUBE, AUSTRIA , 1997 .

[15]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Large rivers: the relevance of ecotonal structure and hydrological properties for the fish fauna , 2001 .

[16]  J. Ward.  RIVERINE LANDSCAPES: BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS, DISTURBANCE REGIMES, AND AQUATIC CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[17]  R. Lasker.  What limits clupeoid production , 1985 .

[18]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Prey detection in cyprinids during early development , 1989 .

[19]  M. Zalewski,et al.  The Importance of Riparian Ecotones for Diversity and Productivity of Riverine Fish Communities , 1991 .

[20]  H. Keckeis,et al.  Survival, development and food energy partitioning of nase larvae and early juveniles at different temperatures , 2001 .

[21]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Zooplankton abundance in the River Danube, Austria: the significance of inshore retention , 1999 .

[22]  P. Gaudin.  Habitat shifts in juvenile riverine fishes , 2001 .

[23]  M. Peňáz.  Chondrostoma nasus - its reproduction strategy and possible reasons for a widely observed population decline - a review , 1996 .

[24]  H. Keckeis,et al.  Effects of reduced oxygen level on the mortality and hatching rate of Chondrostoma nasus embryos , 1996 .

[25]  H. Wintersberger,et al.  Fish fry associations: Important indicators for the ecological status of large rivers , 1991 .

[26]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Diet shifts in 0+ nase, Chondrostoma nasus: Size-specific differences and the effect of food availability , 2001 .

[27]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation , 1995 .

[28]  G. Bornette,et al.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[29]  G. Copp.  Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a lotic floodplain channel , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[30]  R. Chambers,et al.  Early Life History and Recruitment in Fish Populations , 1997, Chapman & Hall Fish and Fisheries Series.

[31]  H. Keckeis,et al.  The effect of water current on foraging behaviour of the rheophilic cyprinid Chondrostoma nasus (L.) during ontogeny: evidence of a trade-off between energetic gain and swimming costs , 1998 .

[32]  F. Schiemer,et al.  The inshore retention concept and its significance for large rivers , 2001 .

[33]  L. Fuiman.  The interplay of ontogeny and scaling in the interactions of fish larvae and their predators , 1994 .

[34]  Jennifer L. Hill,et al.  An Energetic Model of Microhabitat Use for Rainbow Trout and Rosyside Dace , 1993 .

[35]  A. Kirchhofer,et al.  Conservation of endangered freshwater fish in Europe , 2011, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[36]  J. Karr.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  P. Gaudin,et al.  Size-related changes in diel distribution of young grayling (Thymallus thymallus) , 1995 .

[38]  F. Schiemer,et al.  TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DYNAMICS OF 0+ CHONDROSTOMA NASUS, AT THE INSHORE ZONE OF A LARGE RIVER , 1997 .

[39]  H. Keckeis,et al.  Reaction field, capture field, and search volume of 0+ nase (Chondrostoma nasus) : effects of body size and water velocity , 2000 .

[40]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  Position Choice by Drift-Feeding Salmonids: Model and Test for Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Subarctic Mountain Streams, Interior Alaska , 1990 .

[41]  D. Pont,et al.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: fish in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[42]  F. Schiemer,et al.  ENDANGERED FISH SPECIES OF THE DANUBE RIVER IN AUSTRIA , 1989 .

[43]  R. Kaufmann.  RESPIRATORY COST OF SWIMMING IN LARVAL AND JUVENILE CYPRINIDS , 1990 .