Magnitude and timing of conditioned responses in delay and trace classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

The present experiment characterized conditioned nictitating membrane (NM) movements as a function of CS duration, using the full range of discernible movements (>.06 mm) rather than movements exceeding a conventional criterion (>.50 mm). The CS-US interval was fixed at 500 ms, while across groups, the duration of the CS was 50 ms (trace), 550 ms (delay), or 1050 ms (extended delay). The delay group showed the highest level of acquisition. When tested with the different CS durations, the delay and extended delay groups showed large reductions in their responses when their CS was shortened to 50 ms, but the trace group maintained its response at all durations. Timing of the conditioned movements appeared similar across all manipulations. The results suggest that the CS has both a fine timing function tied to CS onset and a general predictive function tied to CS duration, both of which may be mediated by cerebellar pathways.

[1]  I. Pavlov,et al.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex , 2010, Annals of Neurosciences.

[2]  N. Schneiderman Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .

[3]  J. B. Sidowski,et al.  Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology , 1966 .

[4]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Conditioned response timing and integration in the cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[5]  Kirk N. Olsen,et al.  Scalar timing varies with response magnitude in classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 2009, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Adaptive timing in neural networks: The conditioned response , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Covariation of alternative measures of responding in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) eyeblink conditioning during acquisition training and tone generalization. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[10]  D. Claflin,et al.  A developmental comparison of trace and delay eyeblink conditioning in rats using matching interstimulus intervals. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[11]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning , 1989, Neural Networks.

[12]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Members of underrepresented groups: Reviewers for journal manuscripts wanted , 1989 .

[14]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Kimberly S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Are separate theories of conditioning and timing necessary? , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  JOHN W. Moore A Neuroscientist's Guide to Classical Conditioning , 2002 .

[17]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  R. Clark,et al.  Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. , 1998, Science.

[19]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  Hippocampal lesions in rats differentially affect long- and short-trace eyeblink conditioning , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  A. Machado Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. , 1997, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Where is the trace in trace conditioning? , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar function: Coordination, learning or timing? , 2000, Current Biology.

[23]  Elliot A. Ludvig,et al.  Magnitude and timing of nictitating membrane movements during classical conditioning of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 2008, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  A computational model of hippocampal function in trace conditioning , 2008, NIPS.

[25]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[27]  Bernard G. Schreurs,et al.  Ruler vs. the Apple II/FIRST system analysis of analog signals in classical conditioning , 1982 .

[28]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Compound-component differentiation as a function of CS-US interval and CS duration in the rabbit’s conditioned nictitating membrane response , 1986 .

[29]  E. Kehoe Extension of the CS past the US can facilitate conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  C. M. Gibbs,et al.  Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 1988 .

[31]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Altering the synchrony of stimulus trace processes: tests of a neural-network model , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  E. Kehoe,et al.  In the Blink of an Eye: Real-Time Stimulus Factors in Delay and Trace Conditioning of the Rabbit's Nictitating Membrane Response , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  David J. Willshaw,et al.  A Biophysical Model of Synaptic Delay Learning and Temporal Pattern Recognition in a Cerebellar Purkinje Cell , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[34]  Nestor A. Schmajuk,et al.  Classical conditioning , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[35]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Time-Derivative Models of Pavlovian Reinforcement , 1990 .

[36]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Fundamental Behavioral Methods and Findings in Classical Conditioning , 2002 .

[37]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Acquisition, Extinction, and Reacquisition of a Cerebellar Cortical Memory Trace , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Dean V. Buonomano,et al.  Neural Network Model of the Cerebellum: Temporal Discrimination and the Timing of Motor Responses , 1999, Neural Computation.

[39]  C. Buhusi,et al.  Timing in simple conditioning and occasion setting: a neural network approach , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[40]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[41]  Michael D. Zeiler,et al.  Predictability, correlation, and contiguity , 1981 .

[42]  Jacob Cohen Measurement Educational and Psychological Educational and Psychological Measurement Eta-squared and Partial Eta-squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs Educational and Psychological Measurement Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[43]  Edgar H Vogel,et al.  Stimulus representation in SOP: II. An application to inhibition of delay , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[44]  Louis D. Matzel,et al.  The Role of the Hippocampus in Trace Conditioning: Temporal Discontinuity or Task Difficulty? , 2001, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[45]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[46]  Joseph B. Sidowski,et al.  Behavior research methods and instrumentation , 1968 .