Surveillance of surgical site infection after cholecystectomy using the hospital in Europe link for infection control through surveillance protocol.

BACKGROUND The third most common healthcare-associated infection is surgical site infection (SSI), accounting for 14%-16% of infections. These SSIs are associated with high morbidity, numerous deaths, and greater cost. METHODS A prospective study was conducted to assess the incidence of SSI in a single university hospital in Croatia. We used the Hospital in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS) protocol for surveillance. The SSIs were classified using the standard definition of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system. RESULTS The overall incidence of SSI was 1.44%. The incidence of infection in the open cholecystectomy group was 6.06%, whereas in the laparoscopic group, it was only 0.60%. The incidence density of in-hospital SSIs per 1,000 post-operative days was 5.76. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were significantly younger (53.65±14.65 vs. 64.42±14.17 years; p<0.001), spent roughly one-third as many days in the hospital (2.40±1.72 vs. 8.13±4.78; p<0.001), and had significantly shorter operations by nearly 26 min (60.34±28.34 vs. 85.80±37.17 min; p<0.001). Procedures that started as laparoscopic cholecystectomies and were converted to open procedures (n=28) were reviewed separately. The incidence of SSI in this group was 17.9%. The majority of converted procedures (71.4%) were elective, and the operating time was significantly longer than in other two groups (109.64±85.36 min). CONCLUSION The HELICS protocol has a good concept for the monitoring of SSI, but in the case of cholecystectomy, additional factors such as antibiotic appropriateness, gallbladder entry, empyema of the gallbladder, and obstructive jaundice must be considered.

[1]  S. Houterman,et al.  Risk Factors for Conversion during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy — Experiences from a General Teaching Hospital , 2011, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[2]  R. Kolachalam,et al.  Prolonged (Longer than 3 Hours) Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Reasons and Results , 2011, The American surgeon.

[3]  Ninh T. Nguyen,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  F. Biscione,et al.  Accounting for Incomplete Postdischarge Follow-Up During Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection by Use of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System's Risk Index , 2009, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  F. Corcione,et al.  Results and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in childhood , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  P. Francioli,et al.  Laparoscope Use and Surgical Site Infections in Digestive Surgery , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[7]  D. Byrne Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. , 2006, The Journal of hospital infection.

[8]  N. Kasatpibal,et al.  Extra charge and extra length of postoperative stay attributable to surgical site infection in six selected operations. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[9]  Jennie Wilson Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS) , 2004 .

[10]  R. Gaynes,et al.  Does Using a Laparoscopic Approach to Cholecystectomy Decrease the Risk of Surgical Site Infection? , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[11]  A. Emmerson,et al.  Surgical site infection surveillance. , 2000, The Journal of hospital infection.

[12]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[13]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[14]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  E. Brown,et al.  Survey of guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. , 1993, The Journal of hospital infection.

[16]  R. Gaynes,et al.  An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory , 1993, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[17]  W J Martone,et al.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. , 1992, American journal of infection control.

[18]  W J Martone,et al.  Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Keats The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. , 1978, Anesthesiology.