Factors influencing intention to donate via social network site (SNS): From Asian's perspective

Examines factors influencing the general attitude and intention to donate via SNS.Explores the mediation effect of general attitude towards online donation.Internet technology features influence general attitude towards online donation.General attitude positively influences the intention to donate via SNS.The full mediation effect of general attitude towards online donation was found. This study examined whether external factors, which are charity project, charity organization, Internet technology features and social network site (SNS) features influence people's general attitude towards online donation and their intention to donate via SNS. An online survey was conducted based on the framework of factors influencing the intention to donate via SNS that was adapted from the literature review. Data from 258 respondents were used for analysis. Structural equation modelling was used to test the research model and hypotheses. The results indicated that the Internet technology features factor significantly contributes in influencing people's general attitude towards online donation, and general attitude positively influences people's intention to donate via SNSs. The full mediation effect of the general attitude towards online donation on the relationship between Internet technology features and intention to donate via SNS was found. However, charity project, charity organization, and SNS features were not significant factors in influencing people's intention to donate via SNSs. The sample was limited to some Asian countries (preliminary Malaysia and South Korea). Thus, the results cannot be generalized to other countries. The findings suggest that non-profit organizations should focus on how to deal with the Internet issues, especially pertaining to security and privacy. Therefore, a mechanism for gaining donors' trust to use the Internet, particularly in doing online transaction must be considered.

[1]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Kaye D. Sweetser,et al.  Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations , 2010 .

[3]  Yoojung Kim,et al.  Networking for Philanthropy: Increasing Volunteer Behavior via Social Networking Sites , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Jos van Iwaarden,et al.  Charities: how important is performance to donors? , 2009 .

[5]  Michel Plaisent,et al.  Community of practice mediated by Internet: The case of Philanthropy-Quebec , 2012, 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP).

[6]  Richard D. Waters.  Applying relationship management theory to the fundraising process for individual donors , 2008 .

[7]  Andrew Reeson,et al.  Institutions, motivations and public goods: An experimental test of motivational crowding , 2008 .

[8]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[9]  Katherine Branston,et al.  The nature of online social good networks and their impact on non- profit organisations and users , 2010 .

[10]  Horst Treiblmaier,et al.  A Framework for Measuring People's Intention to Donate Online , 2006, PACIS.

[11]  Christoph M. Schmidt,et al.  Time vs. Money: The Supply of Voluntary Labor and Charitable Donations Across Europe , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  René Bekkers,et al.  Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money , 2010 .

[13]  Femida Handy,et al.  Understanding online donor behavior: the role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks , 2012 .

[14]  Kin Keung Lai,et al.  Individual's Charity Intention in Hong Kong: An Empirical Study on Charitable Behavior , 2011, 2011 Fourth International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization.

[15]  Chun-Tuan Chang,et al.  Intrinsic or Extrinsic? Determinants Affecting Donation Behaviors , 2008 .

[16]  Jacob Solomon,et al.  Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites , 2014, CSCW.

[17]  Clarence L. Wardell,et al.  Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation , 2014 .

[18]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Predictors of Young People's Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective , 2012 .

[19]  Ronald A. Yaros,et al.  Cultivating support for nonprofit news organizations: commitment, trust and donating audiences , 2013 .

[20]  Jochem Tolsma,et al.  Explaining monetary donations to international development organisations: A factorial survey approach. , 2013, Social science research.

[21]  Sander van der Linden,et al.  Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model , 2011 .

[22]  Arthur C. Brooks,et al.  Why do People Give? , 2005 .

[23]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Predicting MBA graduates’ donation behaviour to their alma mater , 2012 .

[24]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections , 2011, Psychology & health.

[25]  Lisa Harris,et al.  Rethinking measurements of social media use by charities: a mixed methods approach , 2013, WebSci.

[26]  Liviu Iftode,et al.  Infrastructures for Online Social Networking Services [Guest editorial] , 2012, IEEE Internet Comput..

[27]  Danit Ein-Gar,et al.  Giving from a distance: Putting the charitable organization at the center of the donation appeal , 2013 .

[28]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[29]  Joanne R Smith,et al.  Charitable giving: the effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour , 2007 .

[30]  Li-Wen Chuang,et al.  Understanding online shopping intention: the roles of four types of trust and their antecedents , 2014, Internet Res..

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Richard Hoefer,et al.  From Web site visitor to online contributor: three internet fundraising techniques for nonprofits. , 2012, Social work.

[33]  Katherine M White,et al.  Predicting the retention of first‐time donors using an extended Theory of Planned Behavior , 2012, Transfusion.

[34]  Sarah Quinton,et al.  Missing a strategic marketing trick? The use of online social networks by UK charities , 2013 .

[35]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[37]  I. Ajzen.  Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  Giving is caring: understanding donation behavior through email , 2014, CSCW.

[39]  C. Reddick,et al.  The Effect of Individuals’ Organization Affiliation on Their Internet Donations , 2013 .

[40]  R. Kasri,et al.  Giving Behaviors in Indonesia: Motives and Marketing Implications for Islamic Charities , 2013 .

[41]  René Bekkers,et al.  A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy , 2010 .

[42]  Soumava Bandyopadhyay.  Consumers’ online privacy concerns: causes and effects , 2017 .

[43]  Pamela E. Grimm,et al.  Communal and exchange relationship perceptions as separate constructs and their role in motivations to donate , 2010 .

[44]  Lynda Andrews,et al.  Differences between students and non-students' willingness to donate to a charitable organisation , 2010 .

[45]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  Generosity the Second Time Around , 2014 .

[46]  S. Ranganathan,et al.  Determinants of charitable donation intentions: a structural equation model† , 2008 .