Effect of Pavement Type on Overlay Roughness Progression

This paper investigates the impact of overlay type (asphalt and concrete) on the progression of pavement roughness as described by the international roughness index (IRI). Pavement roughness is defined as deformities or irregularities found at the pavement surface affecting the smoothness of a ride. Both overlays in this study are asphalt: one placed on asphalt paved roads and one placed on top of prior concrete pavement. Data were collected from nine states using data in the Long-Term Pavement Performance database (GPS6 and GPS7). Only U.S. states and Canadian provinces that have both GPS6 and GPS7 sections are considered for analysis. Pavement factors (overlay age, temperature, freezing index, and overlay thickness) that significantly impact overlay performance in U.S. and Canadian environments have been used for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the effect of key variables (age, temperature, freezing index, and surface thickness) on IRI. Results show that there is a significant difference between overlay types in terms of the effect of key variables on IRI. Asphalt on concrete overlay has a significantly better IRI performance in terms of age, temperature, and surface thickness. Asphalt on asphalt overlay has a significantly better performance in terms of freezing index. This suggests that when age, temperature, and surface thickness are considered, asphalt on concrete provides a better IRI. Asphalt on asphalt provides a better IRI for freezing index.

[1]  Kathleen T. Hall,et al.  Performance of Rigid Pavement Rehabilitation Treatments in the Long-Term Pavement Performance SPS-6 Experiment , 2003 .

[2]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Acceptability of Pavement Roughness on Urban Highways by Driving Public , 2003 .

[3]  Guoqing Zhou,et al.  Analysis of Flexible Pavement Distresses on IRI Model , 2008 .

[4]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[5]  Rohan W. Perera,et al.  Ride Quality Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements Subjected to Different Rehabilitation Strategies , 2006 .

[6]  Susan Tighe.  Evaluation of subgrade and climatic zone influences on pavement performance in the Canadian Strategic Highway Program's (C-SHRP) Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) study , 2002 .

[7]  Ashraf Rahim,et al.  Evaluation of international roughness index for asphalt overlays placed over cracked and seated concrete pavements , 2009 .

[8]  Shelley M Stoffels,et al.  Observed evidence of subgrade moisture influence on pavement longitudinal profile , 2008 .

[9]  Jakob B. Madsen.  Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995 , 1998 .

[10]  Turki I. Al-Suleiman (Obaidat),et al.  Prediction of Pavement Remaining Service Life Using Roughness Data—Case Study in Dubai , 2003 .

[11]  Karim Chatti,et al.  Effects of Design and Site Factors on Roughness of Flexible Pavements in the LTPP SPS-1 Experiment , 2006 .

[12]  Charles E Dougan,et al.  Models Relating Pavement Quality Measures , 2004 .

[13]  Ralph Haas,et al.  Analysis of Influences on As-built Pavement Roughness in Asphalt Overlays , 2003 .

[14]  Qiang Li,et al.  Experimentation with Gray Theory for Pavement Smoothness Prediction , 2007 .

[15]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[16]  S. Tighe,et al.  Assessment of Overlay Roughness in Long-Term Pavement Performance Test Sites: Canadian Case Study , 2004 .

[17]  Harold L. Von Quintus,et al.  Smoothness Models for Hot-Mix Asphalt-Surfaced Pavements: Developed from Long-Term Pavement Performance Program Data , 2001 .

[18]  Christopher R Byrum,et al.  The Effect of Faulting on IRI Values for Jointed Concrete Pavements , 2005 .