On the nature of neural information: A critique of the received view 50 years later

We offer a critical review of the concept of neural information, as received within mainstream neuroscience from Artificial Intelligence. This conception of information is constructed as a conditional probability of a stimulus given a certain neural activation, a correlation that cannot be accessed by the organism and fails to explain its causal organization. We reconstruct an alternative conception of neural information: a pattern of signals that is selected by the organism (as an autonomous system) to contribute to its self-maintenance in virtue of its correlation with external conditions, a correlation that might further be evaluated by the very system.

[1]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  The evolution of complexity in human brain development: an EEG study. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Value-dependent selection in the brain: Simulation in a synthetic neural model , 1994, Neuroscience.

[3]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[4]  A. Hill.  The Basis of Sensation: the Action of the Sense Organs , 1929, Nature.

[5]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[6]  Xabier E. Barandiaran.  Conceptual Models and Synthetic Methodologies for a Post-Cognitivist Psychology , 2007 .

[7]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Operant Reward Learning in Aplysia: Neuronal Correlates and Mechanisms , 2002, Science.

[8]  A. Kolmogorov.  Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information , 1968 .

[9]  E. Kandel.  The Molecular Biology of Memory Storage: A Dialogue Between Genes and Synapses , 2001, Science.

[10]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Information and representation in autonomous agents , 2000, Cognitive Systems Research.

[11]  T. Kohonen.  Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[12]  Sally P. Springer.  Biology of Cognition. , 1981 .

[13]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[14]  BarandiaranXabier,et al.  On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive , 2006 .

[15]  R. Beer.  Dynamical approaches to cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  James H. Moor,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information. , 1982 .

[17]  W. Freeman.  How Brains Make Up Their Minds , 1999 .

[18]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[19]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .

[20]  Adrian edgar douglas.  The basis of sensation: the action of the sense organs. , 1964 .

[21]  F. Keijzer.  Representation and Behavior , 2001 .

[22]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On Semantic Information , 1970 .

[23]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: A Survey , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[24]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  Searching for the roots of autonomy: The natural and artificial paradigms revisited , 2000 .

[25]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. , 1985 .

[27]  Tracy Brown,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2002, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[28]  Jeffrey L. Krichmar,et al.  Brain-Based Devices for the Study of Nervous Systems and the Development of Intelligent Machines , 2005, Artificial Life.

[29]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Lindley Darden,et al.  Discovering Complexity , 1996 .

[31]  Neurobiology: Understanding the consequences , 2002, Nature.

[32]  M. Litch,et al.  On Explaining Behavior , 2000 .

[33]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Age increases brain complexity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  William Bechtel,et al.  Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research , 2010 .

[35]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Marcus Hutter,et al.  Algorithmic Information Theory , 1977, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[37]  R. Kirk.  Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories , 1985 .

[38]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  The Process Dynamics of Normative Function , 2002 .

[39]  James L. McGaugh,et al.  Brain Organization and Memory: Cells, Systems, and Circuits , 1992 .

[40]  Cora Diamond.  Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. , 1983 .

[41]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Information, mechanism and meaning , 1969 .

[42]  P Arhem,et al.  On the coevolution of cognition and consciousness. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  G. Edelman.  Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[44]  Paul Bourgine,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 2004, Artificial Life.

[45]  Jonathan D Victor,et al.  Approaches to Information-Theoretic Analysis of Neural Activity , 2006, Biological theory.

[46]  W. Ashby.  Design for a Brain , 1954 .

[47]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Representations: Who Needs Them? , 1990 .

[48]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organization Program , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[49]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[50]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Book Review , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Karl J. Friston.  The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.