Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?

IntroductionVirtual reality (VR) simulators have been developed to train basic endoscopic surgical skills outside of the operating room. An important issue is how to create optimal conditions for integration of these types of simulators into the surgical training curriculum. The willingness of surgical residents to train these skills on a voluntary basis was surveyed.MethodsTwenty-one surgical residents were given unrestricted access to a VR simulator for a period of four months. After this period, a competitive element was introduced to enhance individual training time spent on the simulator. The overall end-scores for individual residents were announced periodically to the full surgical department, and the winner was awarded a prize.ResultsIn the first four months of study, only two of the 21 residents (10%) trained on the simulator, for a total time span of 163 minutes. After introducing the competitive element the number of trainees increased to seven residents (33%). The amount of training time spent on the simulator increased to 738 minutes.ConclusionsFree unlimited access to a VR simulator for training basic endoscopic skills, without any form of obligation or assessment, did not motivate surgical residents to use the simulator. Introducing a competitive element for enhancing training time had only a marginal effect. The acquisition of expensive devices to train basic psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery is probably only effective when it is an integrated and mandatory part of the surgical curriculum.

[1]  R. Wolterbeek,et al.  Gynecological laparoscopy in residency training program: Dutch perspectives , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[2]  G. Sakorafas,et al.  New legislative regulations, problems, and future perspectives, with a particular emphasis on surgical education. , 2004, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[3]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course—improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[5]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[6]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  L. Chang,et al.  Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective? , 2007, Surgical endoscopy.

[9]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[11]  H. Lönroth,et al.  The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  L. Chang,et al.  Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.