Towards a predictive model of species interaction beta diversity.

Species interactions are fundamental to community dynamics and ecosystem processes. Despite significant progress in describing species interactions, we lack the ability to predict changes in interactions across space and time. We outline a Bayesian approach to separate the probability of species co-occurrence, interaction and detectability in influencing interaction betadiversity. We use a multi-year hummingbird-plant time series, divided into training and testing data, to show that including models of detectability and occurrence improves forecasts of mutualistic interactions. We then extend our model to explore interaction betadiversity across two distinct seasons. Despite differences in the observed interactions among seasons, there was no significant change in hummingbird occurrence or interaction frequency between hummingbirds and plants. These results highlight the challenge of inferring the causes of interaction betadiversity when interaction detectability is low. Finally, we highlight potential applications of our model for integrating observations of local interactions with biogeographic and evolutionary histories of co-occurring species. These advances will provide new insight into the mechanisms that drive variation in patterns of biodiversity.

[1]  Nicole E Miller-Struttmann,et al.  High-altitude multi-taskers: bumble bee food plant use broadens along an altitudinal productivity gradient , 2014, Oecologia.

[2]  M. Stevens,et al.  Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance , 2017, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[3]  Christian Mazza,et al.  Matching–centrality decomposition and the forecasting of new links in networks , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  D. Carstensen,et al.  Modularity, pollination systems, and interaction turnover in plant-pollinator networks across space. , 2016, Ecology.

[5]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks , 2008 .

[6]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[7]  R. O’Hara,et al.  Species interactions: estimating per‐individual interaction strength and covariates before simplifying data into per‐species ecological networks , 2013 .

[8]  I. Bartomeus,et al.  On the inconsistency of pollinator species traits for predicting either response to land-use change or functional contribution , 2018 .

[9]  D. Porteous,et al.  Structural Models of Human eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 Reveal Two Distinct Surface Clusters of Sequence Variation and Potential Differences in Phosphorylation , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[11]  Jason M Tylianakis,et al.  Specialization and Rarity Predict Nonrandom Loss of Interactions from Mutualist Networks , 2012, Science.

[12]  Sonia Kéfi,et al.  Describe, understand and predict: why do we need networks in ecology? , 2016 .

[13]  N. Waser,et al.  Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[14]  Jeremy W. Fox,et al.  Species traits and abundances predict metrics of plant–pollinator network structure, but not pairwise interactions , 2015 .

[15]  D. Wilson,et al.  Optimal Foraging, Specialization, and a Solution to Liem's Paradox , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[16]  H. Briggs,et al.  Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks , 2015 .

[18]  C. Graham,et al.  Phylogenetic scale in ecology and evolution , 2016, bioRxiv.

[19]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[20]  J. Thomson Flowering phenology, fruiting success and progressive deterioration of pollination in an early-flowering geophyte , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[22]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  Sampling bias is a challenge for quantifying specialization and network structure: lessons from a quantitative niche model , 2016 .

[23]  Paul J. CaraDonna,et al.  Phenological overlap of interacting species in a changing climate: an assessment of available approaches , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[24]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Judith L Bronstein,et al.  Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant-pollinator networks. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[26]  N. Mouquet,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Neutral Interactions in Host-Parasite Networks , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant - animal interactions , 2015 .

[28]  I. Bartomeus,et al.  Biodiversity ensures plant-pollinator phenological synchrony against climate change. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[29]  Honeybee spillover reshuffles pollinator diets and affects plant reproductive success , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[30]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[31]  Monica F. Poelchau,et al.  Differential effects of landscape‐level environmental features on genetic structure in three codistributed tree species in Central America , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[32]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations , 2017 .

[33]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Trophic theory of island biogeography. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[34]  K. Winemiller Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks , 1990 .

[35]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Morphological traits determine specialization and resource use in plant–hummingbird networks in the neotropics , 2014 .

[36]  C. Graham,et al.  Persistent bill and corolla matching despite shifting temporal resources in tropical hummingbird-plant interactions. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[37]  D. Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement and Speciation in Sticklebacks , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[39]  Ramiro Aguilar,et al.  Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation? , 2004 .

[40]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[41]  Qing‐Feng Wang,et al.  Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination: can pollinator abundance shift the plant–plant interactions? , 2013, Plant Ecology.

[42]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[43]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology Letters.

[44]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Using Phylogenetic, Functional and Trait Diversity to Understand Patterns of Plant Community Productivity , 2009, PloS one.

[45]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Quantifying hummingbird preference for floral trait combinations: The role of selection on trait interactions in the evolution of pollination syndromes , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Sampling networks of ecological interactions , 2015, bioRxiv.

[47]  J. Ascher,et al.  Measuring partner choice in plant-pollinator networks: using null models to separate rewiring and fidelity from chance. , 2016, Ecology.

[48]  Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto,et al.  A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant-animal mutualistic interactions. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[49]  Nico Blüthgen,et al.  Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide , 2010 .

[50]  Jason M. Tylianakis,et al.  Ecological Networks Across Environmental Gradients , 2017 .

[51]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[52]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  On the structural stability of mutualistic systems , 2014, Science.

[53]  N. Mouquet,et al.  On the integration of biotic interaction and environmental constraints at the biogeographical scale , 2016 .

[54]  M. Fortin,et al.  Hosts, parasites and their interactions respond to different climatic variables , 2017 .

[55]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Geographical variation in mutualistic networks: similarity, turnover and partner fidelity , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  On the selection of phylogenetic eigenvectors for ecological analyses , 2012 .

[57]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  Understanding Linkage Rules in Plant-Pollinator Networks by Using Hierarchical Models That Incorporate Pollinator Detectability and Plant Traits , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network , 2008 .

[59]  Allan G. Ellis,et al.  Beta diversity of herbivorous insects is coupled to high species and phylogenetic turnover of plant communities across short spatial scales in the Cape Floristic Region , 2017 .

[60]  Phillip P. A. Staniczenko,et al.  Linking macroecology and community ecology: refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks , 2017, Ecology letters.

[61]  L. Burkle,et al.  Shifts in pollinator composition and behavior cause slow interaction accumulation with area in plant-pollinator networks. , 2012, Ecology.

[62]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[63]  D. Vázquez,et al.  Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant-pollinator network. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[64]  Catherine Crea,et al.  A new model for ecological networks using species‐level traits , 2016 .

[65]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[67]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Site Occupancy Models with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2006, Biometrics.

[68]  M. McCarthy,et al.  The influence of abundance on detectability , 2013 .

[69]  Luis Santamaría,et al.  Linkage Rules for Plant–Pollinator Networks: Trait Complementarity or Exploitation Barriers? , 2007, PLoS biology.

[70]  M. Novak,et al.  The application of Bayesian hierarchical models to quantify individual diet specialization. , 2017, Ecology.

[71]  A. Biere,et al.  Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[72]  Timothée Poisot,et al.  Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks , 2018 .

[73]  Robert J. Whittaker,et al.  Multimodal species abundance distributions: a deconstruction approach reveals the processes behind the pattern , 2014 .

[74]  M. Quesada,et al.  A quantitative review of pollination syndromes: do floral traits predict effective pollinators? , 2014, Ecology letters.

[75]  Marlies Sazima,et al.  Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a Neotropical plant-hummingbird network. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[76]  Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni,et al.  Morphological and Spatio‐Temporal Mismatches Shape a Neotropical Savanna Plant‐Hummingbird Network , 2014 .

[77]  D. Gravel,et al.  Trait matching and phylogeny as predictors of predator–prey interactions involving ground beetles , 2018 .

[78]  C. Graham,et al.  Effects of hummingbird morphology on specialization in pollination networks vary with resource availability , 2017 .

[79]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  A general model of detectability using species traits , 2013 .

[80]  Brody Sandel,et al.  Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks , 2013 .

[81]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Ben G. Weinstein,et al.  On comparing traits and abundance for predicting species interactions with imperfect detection , 2017 .

[83]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  The structure of probabilistic networks , 2016 .

[84]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions , 2015, bioRxiv.

[85]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor , 2015 .

[86]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Phylogeography: spanning the ecology‐evolution continuum , 2013 .

[87]  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Electroconvulsive Therapy Induces Neurogenesis in Frontal Rat Brain Areas , 2013, PloS one.

[88]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Ecological Specialization and Susceptibility to Disturbance: Conjectures and Refutations , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[89]  P. Jordano,et al.  A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[90]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[91]  Ben G. Weinstein,et al.  MotionMeerkat: integrating motion video detection and ecological monitoring , 2015 .

[92]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Bringing Elton and Grinnell Together: a quantitative framework to represent the biogeography of ecological interaction networks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[93]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time , 2014, bioRxiv.

[94]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Species Abundance, Not Diet Breadth, Drives the Persistence of the Most Linked Pollinators as Plant-Pollinator Networks Disassemble , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[95]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Phylogeny, ecology, and the coupling of comparative and experimental approaches. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[96]  K. Liem Adaptive Significance of Intra- and Interspecific Differences in the Feeding Repertoires of Cichlid Fishes , 1980 .

[97]  J. Ghazoul,et al.  Determinants of the microstructure of plant–pollinator networks , 2014 .

[98]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Inferring food web structure from predator–prey body size relationships , 2013 .