Workspace and stiffness analysis of a three-degree-of-freedom spatial cable-suspended parallel mechanism while considering cable mass

Abstract Most existing research on parallel cable-driven mechanisms has been performed while neglecting cable mass. However, those prior works that did take cable mass into account have shown that such a hypothesis may lead to significant errors in the analysis of these mechanisms. The research presented herein assesses the effect of neglecting cable mass in the analysis of a spatial parallel three-degree-of-freedom suspended cable-driven mechanism. The analysis is based on the elastic catenary model. The inverse displacement problem of the mechanism is solved numerically subject to constraints on the cable tensions and restrictions on cable drooping. This solution is then used in the numerical estimation of the mechanism workspace. The stiffness of the mechanism is evaluated throughout the workspace by mapping intuitive stiffness indices that are extracted from the stiffness matrix. Both the mechanism workspace and stiffness are found to be heavily influenced by cable sagging. The results obtained in this paper support the notion that the effect of cable sagging on a mechanism should be thoroughly assessed prior to pursuing a design based on the assumption of massless cables.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Stability Analysis of Underconstrained Cable-Driven Parallel Robots , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Masaru Uchiyama,et al.  On the stiffness and stability of Gough-Stewart platforms , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[3]  B. Y. Duan,et al.  Dynamic modeling and active control of a cable-suspended parallel robot , 2008 .

[4]  Moharam Habibnejad Korayem,et al.  Workspace analysis of cable-suspended robots with elastic cable , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[5]  Ou Ma,et al.  Dynamics analysis of a cable-driven parallel manipulator for hardware-in-the-loop dynamic simulation , 2005, Proceedings, 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics..

[6]  Rendong Nan,et al.  A Chinese concept for the 1 km2 radio telescope , 2000 .

[7]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Computation of stiffness and stiffness bounds for parallel link manipulators 1 This research was sup , 1999 .

[8]  Saeed Behzadipour,et al.  Stiffness of Cable-based Parallel Manipulators With Application to Stability Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  A Concept for Rapidly-Deployable Cable Robot Search and Rescue Systems , 2005 .

[10]  Manfred Hiller,et al.  Continuous Workspace Analysis, Synthesis and Optimization of Wire Robots , 2008 .

[11]  Qian Zhou,et al.  Static analysis of cable-driven manipulators with non-negligible cable mass , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Manfred Hiller,et al.  Estimating the Controllable Workspace of Tendon-Based Stewart Platforms , 2000 .

[13]  Mingyang Zhao,et al.  Control of a 3-DOF Parallel Wire Driven Stiffness-Variable Manipulator , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[14]  Samuel Bouchard Géométrie des robots parallèles entraînés par des câbles , 2008 .

[15]  Rui Yao,et al.  Dimensional Design on the Six-Cable Driven Parallel Manipulator of FAST , 2011 .

[16]  Marc Arsenault Stiffness Analysis of a 2-DoF Planar Tensegrity Mechanism , 2008 .

[17]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Cable-suspended robotic contour crafting system , 2007 .

[18]  Manfred Hiller,et al.  Workspace, Stiffness, Singularities and Classification of Tendon-Driven Stewart Platforms , 1998 .

[19]  James S. Albus,et al.  The NIST robocrane , 1993, J. Field Robotics.

[20]  Marc Arsenault Stiffness Analysis of a Planar 2-DoF Cable-Suspended Mechanism While Considering Cable Mass , 2013 .

[21]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Analysis of the wrench-closure workspace of planar parallel cable-driven mechanisms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[22]  Franc¸ois Pierrot,et al.  On the Static Workspace of Large Dimension Cable-Suspended Robots With Non Negligible Cable Mass , 2010 .

[23]  Marc Gouttefarde,et al.  Effects of non-negligible cable mass on the static behavior of large workspace cable-driven parallel mechanisms , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Imme Ebert-Uphoff,et al.  Wrench-based analysis of cable-driven robots , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[25]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Interval-Analysis-Based Determination of the Wrench-Feasible Workspace of Parallel Cable-Driven Robots , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[26]  Marc Gouttefarde,et al.  Simplified static analysis of large-dimension parallel cable-driven robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Kinematics of the wire-driven parallel robot MARIONET using linear actuators , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[28]  Stefan Havlik Cable Suspended Manipulation Robots , 1999 .

[29]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of cable structures , 2011 .