Quartz and Dust Exposure in Swedish Iron Foundries

Exposure to respirable quartz continues to be a major concern in the Swedish iron foundry industry. Recommendations for reducing the European occupational exposure limit (EU-OEL) to 0.05 mg/m 3 and the corresponding ACGIH® threshold limit value (ACGIH-TLV) to 0.025 mg/m 3 prompted this exposure survey. Occupational exposure to respirable dust and respirable quartz were determined in 11 Swedish iron foundries, representing different sizes of industrial operation and different manufacturing techniques. In total, 436 respirable dust and 435 respirable quartz exposure measurements associated with all job titles were carried out and are presented as time-weighted averages. Our sampling strategy enabled us to evaluate the use of respirators in certain jobs, thus determining actual exposure. In addition, measurements using real-time dust monitors were made for high exposure jobs. For respirable quartz, 23% of all the measurements exceeded the EU-OEL, and 56% exceeded the ACGIH-TLV. The overall geometric mean (GM) for the quartz levels was 0.028 mg/m 3 , ranging from 0.003 to 2.1 mg/m 3 . Fettler and furnace and ladle repair operatives were exposed to the highest levels of both respirable dust (GM = 0.69 and 1.2 mg/m 3 ; range 0.076–31 and 0.25–9.3 mg/m 3 and respirable quartz (GM = 0.041 and 0.052 mg/m 3 ; range 0.004–2.1 and 0.0098–0.83 mg/m 3 . Fettlers often used respirators and their actual quartz exposure was lower (range 0.003–0.21 mg/m 3 , but in some cases it still exceeded the Swedish OEL (0.1 mg/m 3 . For furnace and ladle repair operatives, the actual quartz exposure did not exceed the OEL (range 0.003–0.08 mg/m 3 , but most respirators provided insufficient protection, i.e., factors less than 200. In summary, measurements in Swedish iron foundries revealed high exposures to respirable quartz, in particular for fettlers and furnace and ladle repair workers. The suggested EU-OEL and the ACGIH-TLV were exceeded in, respectively, 23% and 56% of all measurements regardless of the type of foundry. Further work on elimination techniques to reduce quartz concentrations, along with control of personal protection equipment, is essential.

[1]  E A Eisen,et al.  The real-time dust exposures of sodium borate workers: examination of exposure variability. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  J. Mulhausen,et al.  A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures , 1998 .

[3]  V. Hertzberg,et al.  Silicosis among foundry workers. Implication for the need to revise the OSHA standard. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  K. Steindorf,et al.  Cancer mortality in a cohort of male German iron foundry workers. , 2003, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  T. Dragani,et al.  Libri Ricevuti: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1992 .

[6]  Dennis R Helsel,et al.  Fabricating data: how substituting values for nondetects can ruin results, and what can be done about it. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[7]  H. Westberg,et al.  Epidemiological adaptation of quartz exposure modeling in Swedish aluminum foundries: nested case-control study on lung cancer. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  M. Kogevinas,et al.  Lung cancer risk in iron and steel foundry workers: a nested case control study in Asturias, Spain. , 2000, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  O. Svane,et al.  Cancer incidence among foundry workers in Denmark. , 1991, Archives of environmental health.

[10]  D. Bleyl,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs vol. 1 to 42. Supplement 7. 440 Seiten. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 1987. Preis: 65, – s.Fr , 1989 .

[11]  A J Orenstein Principles of occupational health. , 1965, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[12]  R. Levine,et al.  Mortality of iron foundry workers: I. Overall findings. , 1990, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[13]  Bindu Raju,et al.  Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-aramid Fibrils. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 68 , 1998, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  V. Palda Is foundry work a risk for cardiovascular disease? A systematic review. , 2003, Occupational medicine.

[15]  P. Mutanen,et al.  Factors predictive of ischemic heart disease mortality in foundry workers exposed to carbon monoxide. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  D. Wegman,et al.  Acute and chronic respiratory effects of sodium borate particulate exposures. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  H Kromhout,et al.  Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. , 1991, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  R. Reich,et al.  Personal protective equipment. , 1955, The New Zealand medical journal.

[19]  Orenstein Aj Principles of occupational health. , 1965 .

[20]  W. Schudel Studien zur Beziehung zwischen Gießerei-Silikose und Tuberkulose , 1960 .

[21]  H E Ayer,et al.  A report on silica exposure levels in United States foundries. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[22]  R. Hornung,et al.  Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .

[23]  D. Rees,et al.  Dust and pneumoconiosis in the South African foundry industry. , 1994, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[24]  Dose related acute irritant symptom responses to occupational exposure to sodium borate dusts. , 1992, British journal of industrial medicine.