Mobility training using a bionic knee orthosis in patients in a post-stroke chronic state: a case series

IntroductionAn emerging area of neurorehabilitation is the use of robotic devices to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of lower extremity physical therapy post-stroke. Many of the robotic devices currently available rely on computer-driven locomotive algorithms combined with partial bodyweight-supported treadmill training that drive reflex stepping with minimal patient intention during therapy. In this case series, we examined the effect of task-oriented mobility training in patients in a post-stroke chronic state using a novel, wearable, mobile, intention-based robotic leg orthosis.Case presentationThree individuals, all of whom had reached a plateau with conventional bodyweight-supported treadmill training, participated in task-oriented mobility therapy (1.5 hours, two to four times per week for four weeks) with a robotic leg orthosis under supervision by a physical therapist. Participant 1 was a 59-year-old Caucasian man, who had an ischemic left stroke six years previously with resultant right hemiparesis. Participant 2 was a 42-year-old Caucasian woman with left hemiparesis after a right stroke 15 months previously. Participant 3 was a 62-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of a right middle cerebral artery aneurysm with third degree sub-arachnoid hemorrhage 10 years ago.Immediately after training, all participants demonstrated improved gait speed (10 meter walk), stride length and walking endurance (6 minute walk) compared with baseline measurements. Improvements were maintained one month after training. Timed up and go and five times sit-to-stand were maintained for all three participants, with only one individual remaining outside the safety performance norm.ConclusionsLower extremity training integrating an intention-based robotic leg orthosis may improve gait speed, endurance and community levels of participation in select patients in a post-stroke chronic state after plateauing within a bodyweight-supported treadmill training program. The wearable, mobile assistive robotic device safely supplemented supervised physical therapy including mobility and balance skill training.

[1]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Should Body Weight–Supported Treadmill Training and Robotic-Assistive Steppers for Locomotor Training Trot Back to the Starting Gate? , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  S A Kautz,et al.  Increased workload enhances force output during pedaling exercise in persons with poststroke hemiplegia. , 1998, Stroke.

[4]  E. Finch Physical rehabilitation outcome measures : a guide to enhanced clinical decision making , 2002 .

[5]  C. Winstein,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  O. J. Espinosa [Hemiplegia]. , 1957, Medicina.

[7]  S. Olney,et al.  Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Robert W. Horst,et al.  A bio-robotic leg orthosis for rehabilitation and mobility enhancement , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  E H Wagner,et al.  Evidence for a non-linear relationship between leg strength and gait speed. , 1996, Age and ageing.

[10]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. , 2011, Physiotherapy.

[11]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Reference Values for the Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis of Data from Elders , 2006, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  E. Gonzalez,et al.  Downey and Darling's physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine , 2001 .

[13]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Relationship of knee extension force to independence in sit-to-stand performance in patients receiving acute rehabilitation. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[16]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Learning Implicitly: Effects of Task and Severity After Stroke , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Do stroke units save lives? , 1993, The Lancet.

[18]  Steven A Kautz,et al.  Validation of a Speed-Based Classification System Using Quantitative Measures of Walking Performance Poststroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Reference Values for the Timed Up and Go Test: A Descriptive Meta‐Analysis , 2006, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[20]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. , 2003, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.