Social influence of a persuasive agent: the role of agent embodiment and evaluative feedback

Feedback can serve as an intervention aimed at reducing household energy consumption. The present study focused on the effects of agent embodiment on behavioral change through feedback. The effects of agent embodiment were studied for female vs. male users. Also factual feedback was compared to evaluative feedback. An experiment was conducted in which 76 participants used a virtual washing machine to clean laundry. They received interactive feedback about their energy consumption, from an embodied agent or from a computer. This feedback indicated the consumption level (factual feedback) or good or bad performance (evaluative feedback). The results showed that evaluative feedback, especially when it was negative, was more effective than factual feedback in reducing energy consumption, independent of the source of the feedback. Overall, for men it did not matter whether the feedback was given by a computer or by an embodied agent, but for women it did: women who interacted with the embodied agent used less energy than women who interacted with the computer.

[1]  M. Newborough,et al.  Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes : Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays , 2007 .

[2]  Corinna Fischer.  Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[3]  Richard H. Smith,et al.  Feeling good after praise for a successful performance: The importance of social comparison information , 2005 .

[4]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[5]  T. Roberts,et al.  Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink , 2005, CHI.

[7]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[8]  Taciano L. Milfont,et al.  Preservation and Utilization: Understanding the Structure of Environmental Attitudes 1 , 2006 .

[9]  R. Cialdini.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .

[10]  Gwendolyn Brandon,et al.  REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY , 1999 .

[11]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[13]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[14]  Jaap Ham,et al.  A robot that says “bad!”: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  Lt Lorna McCalley,et al.  Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation , 2002 .

[16]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  Social Cues in Animated Conversational Agents , 2005 .

[17]  Jrc Jaap Ham,et al.  The persuasive effects of positive and negative social feedback from an embodied agent on energy conservation behavior. , 2008 .

[18]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Cheryl Campanella Bracken,et al.  Criticism or Praise? The Impact of Verbal versus Text-Only Computer Feedback on Social Presence, Intrinsic Motivation, and Recall , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[21]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? , 2007 .

[22]  Christopher G. Lewis.  The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media as real people and places , 1997 .

[23]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher Praise: A Functional Analysis , 1981 .

[24]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[25]  R. Atkinson.  Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. , 2002 .

[26]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Praise: More Than Just Social Reinforcement , 1994 .

[27]  A. Bandura.  Human agency in social cognitive theory. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[28]  Laetitia B Mulder,et al.  The difference between punishments and rewards in fostering moral concerns in social decision making , 2008 .