CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.

In the last decade, computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography, two new cross-sectional techniques for imaging of the colon, emerged. Both techniques show promising initial results in the detection of polyps equal to or greater than 1 cm in diameter in symptomatic patients. Imaging protocols are still mostly under development and prone to change. Both CT and MR colonography generate a large number of source images, which have to be read carefully for filling defects and, if intravenous contrast material is used, enhancing lesions. An important postprocessing technique is multiplanar reformatting, which allows the viewer to see potential lesions in an orientation other than that of the source images. Virtual endoscopy, a volume rendering technique that generates images from within the colon lumen, is used for problem solving. CT and MR colonography have potential advantages over colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: multiplanar capabilities, detection of enhancing lesions that make the distinction between fecal residue and true lesion possible, and ante- and retrograde virtual colonoscopy. Currently, a number of studies suggest that patients have a preference for CT colonography over colonoscopy. Patients consider bowel cleansing the most uncomfortable part of any colon examination; hence, from the acceptance point of view, fecal tagging techniques are promising. Before CT and MR colonography can be implemented in daily practice, they must show approximately the same accuracy as colonoscopy for polyp detection in both symptomatic and screening patients.

[1]  B C Morson,et al.  The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. , 1984, Clinical radiology.

[2]  J. Potter,et al.  Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[3]  C. Johnson,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of double-contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  C. Rezk-Salama,et al.  Local and remote visualization techniques for interactive direct volume rendering in neuroradiology. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J. Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison , 2000, European Radiology.

[7]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  S D Wall,et al.  The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Philippe Lefere,et al.  Diverticular disease in CT colonography , 2003, European Radiology.

[11]  C. Claussen,et al.  Three-dimensional double-contrast MR colonography: a display method simulating double-contrast barium enema. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  L. Weinstock,et al.  Patient Preferences for CT Colonography, Conventional Colonoscopy, and Bowel Preparation , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  G S Gazelle,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer. , 2000, Radiology.

[14]  C. Johnson,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[15]  D. Lomas,et al.  Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema--pilot study. , 2001, Radiology.

[16]  R. Edelman,et al.  MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  C H McCollough,et al.  CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  J. Debatin,et al.  Dark lumen MR-Colonography: initial experience , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  C. Johnson,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  S. Glick Double-contrast barium enema for colorectal cancer screening: a review of the issues and a comparison with other screening alternatives. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  A. Zauber,et al.  The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. , 1990, Gastroenterology.

[22]  J. Debatin,et al.  Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening. , 2001, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[23]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Stool Tagging Applied in Thin-slice Multidetector Computed Tomography Colonography , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography , 2003, European Radiology.

[25]  D. Ott Role of the barium enema in colorectal carcinoma. , 1993, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[26]  J. Kruskal,et al.  Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[27]  Mark A Espeland,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[28]  V Argiro,et al.  Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[29]  Gerald Holtmann,et al.  MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[30]  S. Welin Results of the Malmö technique of colon examination. , 1967, JAMA.

[31]  M. Mushinski,et al.  Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer—united states, 1985 , 1985, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[32]  M. Levine,et al.  Double-contrast barium enema examination technique. , 2000, Radiology.

[33]  S. Steine Which hurts the most? A comparison of pain rating during double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy. , 1994, Radiology.

[34]  Frans Vos,et al.  A Review of Technical Advances in Virtual Colonoscopy , 2001, MedInfo.

[35]  K. Leung,et al.  Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[36]  Corinne A Tipker,et al.  CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. , 2002, Radiology.

[37]  T. Vogl,et al.  Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002 , 2002, European Radiology.

[38]  Marc Baekelandt,et al.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. , 2002, Radiology.

[39]  J F Debatin,et al.  Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[40]  Maciej Orkisz,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of three-dimensional MR angiograms. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[41]  T. Muto,et al.  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum , 1974, Cancer.

[42]  K J Klose,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Colonography and Virtual Magnetic Resonance Colonoscopy with the 1.0-T System: A Feasibility Study , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[43]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders , 1997, The Lancet.

[44]  R. Meuli,et al.  Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy , 2002, Gut.

[45]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[46]  R. Heigh,et al.  Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists. , 1992, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[47]  M. Sleisenger,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  D. Ott Accuracy of double-contrast barium enema in diagnosing colorectal polyps and cancer. , 2000, Seminars in roentgenology.

[49]  M. D’Amato,et al.  Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. , 2000, Gastroenterology.

[50]  J. Yee,et al.  Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[51]  E. Fishman,et al.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[52]  M. Levine,et al.  Diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms at double-contrast barium enema examination. , 2000, Radiology.

[53]  E. McFarland,et al.  Reader strategies for CT colonography , 2001, Abdominal Imaging.

[54]  E. Svensson,et al.  Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. , 2002, Radiology.

[55]  Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients , 2001 .

[56]  M. Macari,et al.  Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. , 2001, Radiology.

[57]  P. Rogalla,et al.  Tissue transition projection (TTP) of the intestines , 2000, European Radiology.

[58]  D. Fleischmann MDCT of renal and mesenteric vessels , 2003, European Radiology.

[59]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[60]  G. Marchal,et al.  Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? , 2002, European Radiology.