The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention

Practice tests and spaced study are both highly potent for enhancing learning and memory. Combining these two methods under the conditions in which they are most effective (i.e., practice tests that invoke successful retrieval from long-term memory and spacing study across days) yields a promising learning technique referred to as successive relearning. Given the obvious implications of successive relearning for promoting student learning and the voluminous literatures on testing and spacing more generally, surprisingly few studies have evaluated successive relearning, and none have done so in an authentic educational context. The two experiments reported here establish the potency of a successive relearning intervention for enhancing student learning by demonstrating meaningful improvements in course exam performance and on long-term retention tests.

[1]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Diagnosing Criterion-Level Effects on Memory , 2011, Psychological science.

[3]  Louis Deslauriers,et al.  Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class , 2011, Science.

[4]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study , 2012 .

[5]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[6]  John Dunlosky,et al.  When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning? , 2012 .

[7]  J. K. Chan,et al.  When does Retrieval Induce Forgetting and When does it Induce Facilitation? Implications for Retrieval Inhibition, Testing Effect, and Text Processing , 2009 .

[8]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming , 2009 .

[9]  G. Mitchell Revisiting Truth or Triviality , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[10]  H. Kay Learning and retaining verbal material. , 1955, British journal of psychology.

[11]  J. K. Chan,et al.  Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials , 2010, Memory.

[12]  T D Wickens,et al.  When further learning fails: stability and change following repeated presentation of text. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  M. Howe Repeated presentation and recall of meaningful prose. , 1970 .

[15]  Harry P. Bahrick,et al.  The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect , 2005 .

[16]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  How and when do students use flashcards? , 2012, Memory.

[17]  H. P. Bahrick Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. , 1979 .

[18]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[19]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? , 2009 .

[20]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  H. F. Spitzer Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[22]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Testing the testing effect in the classroom , 2007 .

[23]  Katherine S. Corker,et al.  Conscientiousness in the classroom: a process explanation. , 2012, Journal of personality.

[24]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[25]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[26]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[29]  H. Pashler,et al.  Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[30]  Keith B. Lyle,et al.  Retrieving Essential Material at the End of Lectures Improves Performance on Statistics Exams , 2011 .

[31]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting , 2007 .

[34]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[35]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adulthood , 2012 .

[36]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  A Controlled Study of Clicker-Assisted Memory Enhancement in College Classrooms , 2012 .

[37]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. , 2011 .

[38]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. , 1989 .

[39]  K. Rawson,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Dropout Schedules of Test-Restudy Practice: Implications for Student Learning , 2011 .

[40]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Goal-Based Accessibility Of Entities Within Situation Models , 2003 .