A framework to study knowledge transfer during information systems development (ISD) process

The information systems development process (ISD) remains a topic of great interest for IS researchers, especially due to the increase in the number of ISD failures. The IS researchers suggest that one possible cause for the failure of ISD may be the lack of relevant knowledge transferred from the system users to system developers. However, IS researchers have not yet directed their attention toward examining the factors that impede the transfer of knowledge among the system users and developers. In order to understand the impediments to the knowledge transfer process during ISD, it is crucial to systematically study how the nature of knowledge transfer unfolds during this process. This chapter provides a framework that allows researchers to study this phenomenon in a systematic fashion. Specifically, it identifies a comprehensive set of factors that influence the knowledge transfer process and posits a set of propositions that future research should examine.

[1]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Strategies for Information Requirements Determination , 1982, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[3]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  Kathalee N. Garrison,et al.  Putting Knowledge to Use. , 1984 .

[6]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[7]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[8]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[10]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity , 1999 .

[11]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions , 1999 .

[12]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  The causes of project failure , 1990 .

[13]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[15]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The Process and Product of System Design , 1978 .

[16]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[17]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[18]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  A Socio-Technical View of Knowledge Sharing at Buckman Laboratories , 1998, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Reengineering the Systems Development Process: The Link Between Autonomous Teams and Business Process Outcomes , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  In the Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance , 1992 .

[21]  Robert J. Hiebeler,et al.  Benchmarking: Knowledge management , 1996 .

[22]  O. Williamson.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[23]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[24]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .