Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale

Background: The Action Research Arm (ARA) test is a performance test of upper extremity motor function which consists of 19 items divided into four hierarchical subtests. This multidimensionality has not yet been tested empirically. Objective: To investigate the dimensionality of the ARA test. Design: Cross-sectional study involving a sample of 63 chronic stroke patients. Methods: A Mokken scale analysis was performed. Results: The Mokken scale analysis revealed one strong unidimensional scale containing all 19 items, of which the scalability coefficient H was 0.79, while H per item ranged from 0.69 to 0.86. The reliability coefficient rho equalled 0.98, indicating a very high internal consistency. A subset of 15 out of 19 items showed an invariant hierarchical item-ordering. Conclusion: The ARA test is a unidimensional scale. The use of subtests, as proposed in the original description of the instrument, is not supported by the present findings. The 15-item scale presented here can be used for adaptive testing, i.e. using only a selected subset of items based on prior knowledge about the patient's abilities, thus minimizing testing time.

[1]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  Painful Hemiplegic Shoulder , 2014 .

[3]  F. Nouri,et al.  The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[4]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[5]  Hemiplegia , 1901, The Hospital.

[6]  L. D. De Souza.  The development of a scale of the Guttman type for the assessment of mobility disability in multiple sclerosis. , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  M. Granat,et al.  Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. , 1999, Stroke.

[8]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[9]  W. Weerdt.  Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: A comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test , 1985 .

[10]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Lyle.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[12]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[13]  L. Guttman.  A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[14]  L. Bouter,et al.  Measuring functional limitations in rising and sitting down: development of a questionnaire. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[16]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Lh De Souza.  The development of a scale of the Guttman type for the assessment of mobility disability in multiple sclerosis , 1999 .

[18]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[20]  Robert J. Mokken,et al.  A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. , 1973 .

[21]  D. Carroll,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. , 1965, Journal of chronic diseases.

[22]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[23]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[25]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  MSP5 for Windows User's Manual , 2000 .

[26]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.