Limiting Behavior of L 1 Adaptive Controllers

This paper analyzes the limiting behavior of L1 adaptive controllers in the presence of fast adaptation. For linear systems it is shown that the L1 adaptive controllers approximate an implementable non–adaptive linear controller, when the adaptation rate approaches infinity. This implies that both the L1 adaptive and the limiting non–adaptive control systems achieve the same control objective. The essential difference between the two systems is in the synthesis of the feedback signal. In the limiting non–adaptive system the feedback signal makes explicit use of the system inverse, while the fast estimation loop of the L1 adaptive controller approximates this inverse map, avoiding the explicit system inversion. This property of the adaptive architecture is essential for its extension to nonlinear systems and also for accommodating various hardware constraints.

[1]  L. Praly,et al.  Adaptive nonlinear regulation: estimation from the Lyapunov equation , 1992 .

[2]  Manfred Morari,et al.  A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs , 1994, Autom..

[3]  G. Stein,et al.  Respect the unstable , 2003 .

[4]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  ℒ1 adaptive controller for nonlinear reference systems , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[5]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Adaptive Engine Control with Multiple Constraints , 2011 .

[6]  Jie Luo,et al.  ℒ1 adaptive output feedback controller for a class of nonlinear systems , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[7]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  L1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[8]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Positive invariant set estimation of L1 adaptive controller in the presence of input saturation , 2013 .

[9]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Stability Margins of ${\cal L}_{1}$ Adaptive Control Architecture , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  L1 Adaptive Output-Feedback Controller for Non-Strictly-Positive-Real Reference Systems: Missile Longitudinal Autopilot Design , 2009 .

[11]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  State space analysis of disturbance observer and a robust stability condition , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[12]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  An almost necessary and sufficient condition for robust stability of closed-loop systems with disturbance observer , 2009, Autom..

[13]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  Adding robustness to nominal output-feedback controllers for uncertain nonlinear systems: A nonlinear version of disturbance observer , 2008, Autom..

[14]  Irene M. Gregory,et al.  $\mathcal {L}_1$Adaptive Control for Safety-Critical Systems , 2011, IEEE Control Systems.

[15]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Comparison of Several Adaptive Controllers According to Their Robustness Metrics , 2010 .

[16]  P. Kokotovic,et al.  The peaking phenomenon and the global stabilization of nonlinear systems , 1991 .