Clinical evaluation of a novel CT image reconstruction algorithm for direct dose calculations

Abstract Background and purpose Computed tomography (CT) imaging is frequently used in radiation oncology to calculate radiation dose distributions. In order to calculate doses, the CT numbers must be converted into densities by an energy dependent conversion curve. A recently developed algorithm directly reconstructs CT projection data into relative electron densities which eliminates the use of separate conversion curves for different X-ray tube potentials. Our work evaluates this algorithm for various cancer sites and shows its applicability in a clinical workflow. Materials and methods The Gammex phantom with tissue mimicking inserts was scanned to characterize the CT number to density conversion curves. In total, 33 patients with various cancer sites were scanned using multiple tube potentials. All CT acquisitions were reconstructed with the standard filtered back-projection (FBP) and the new developed DirectDensity™ (DD) algorithm. The mean tumor doses and the volume percentage that receives more than 95% of the prescribed dose were calculated for the planning target volume. Relevant parameters for the organs at risk for each tumor site were also calculated. Results The relative mean dose differences between the standard 120kVp FBP CT scan workflow and the DD CT scans (80, 100, 120 and 140kVp) were in general less than 1% for the planned target volume and organs at risk. Conclusion The energy independent DD algorithm allows for accurate dose calculations over a variety of body sites. This novel algorithm eliminates the tube potential specific calibration procedure and thereby simplifies the clinical radiotherapy workflow.

[1]  I. Das,et al.  Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning , 2016, Journal of medical physics.

[2]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[3]  Mauro Iori,et al.  Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Vydmantas Atkocius,et al.  Radiotherapy equipment and departments in the European countries: final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  From AAA to Acuros XB-clinical implications of selecting either Acuros XB dose-to-water or dose-to-medium , 2016, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[6]  J. Williamson,et al.  Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: current status and recommendations for clinical implementation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions , 2012, European Radiology.

[8]  L A DeWerd,et al.  An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers. , 1992, Medical physics.

[9]  Samir F. Abboud,et al.  CT of the Abdomen with Reduced Tube Voltage in Adults: A Practical Approach. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  M. Hiraoka,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB, AAA, and XVMC in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  Iterative Reconstruction for Head CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality , 2014, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[13]  T. Vogl,et al.  Third-generation dual-source CT of the neck using automated tube voltage adaptation in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose , 2016, European Radiology.

[14]  P. Kroon,et al.  Dosimetric accuracy and clinical quality of Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation algorithm for stereotactic and conventional lung volumetric modulated arc therapy plans , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[15]  Martin Sedlmair,et al.  Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[16]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Synergistic Radiation Dose Reduction by Combining Automatic Tube Voltage Selection and Iterative Reconstruction , 2016, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[17]  M. Uder,et al.  Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography at High Pitch Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source Scanner: Image Quality and Radiation Dose Performance , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[18]  Y. Nakaguchi,et al.  Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for virtual heterogeneous phantoms and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head and neck , 2015, Radiological Physics and Technology.