Is there a “net generation” in veterinary medicine? A comparative study on the use of the Internet and Web 2.0 by students and the veterinary profession

Introduction: Informal and formal lifelong learning is essential at university and in the workplace. Apart from classical learning techniques, Web 2.0 tools can be used. It is controversial whether there is a so-called net generation amongst people under 30. Aims: To test the hypothesis that a net generation among students and young veterinarians exists. Methods: An online survey of students and veterinarians was conducted in the German-speaking countries which was advertised via online media and traditional print media. Results: 1780 people took part in the survey. Students and veterinarians have different usage patterns regarding social networks (91.9% vs. 69%) and IM (55.9% vs. 24.5%). All tools were predominantly used passively and in private, to a lesser extent also professionally and for studying. Outlook: The use of Web 2.0 tools is useful, however, teaching information and media skills, preparing codes of conduct for the internet and verification of user generated content is essential.

[1]  K. Dawson,et al.  The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  R. J. Repique.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[3]  A F Shaughnessy,et al.  Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning? , 1999, The Western journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Fox,et al.  Developing medical student competence in lifelong learning: the contract learning approach , 1983, Medical education.

[5]  R M Harden,et al.  Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  J. Sandars,et al.  Reflective learning and the Net Generation , 2008, Medical teacher.

[7]  C. Witt.  Medienbildung für die Netz-Generation , 2000 .

[8]  J. M. Genn.  AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. , 2001, Medical teacher.

[9]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  Students as Web 2.0 Authors: Implications for Assessment Design and Conduct. , 2010 .

[10]  L. Heider,et al.  Veterinarians in population health and public practice: meeting critical national needs. , 2003, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[11]  Experiences and attitudes of consultant and nontraining grade anaesthetists to continuing medical education (CME) , 1998, Anaesthesia.

[12]  M. Traugott,et al.  Web survey design and administration. , 2001, Public opinion quarterly.

[13]  M. Mckee,et al.  Do lifelong learning and revalidation ensure that physicians are fit to practise , 2008 .

[14]  S. Gosling,et al.  Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Matt Barton,et al.  Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom , 2010 .

[16]  S. Greysen,et al.  Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. , 2009, JAMA.

[17]  M. Fischer,et al.  Akzeptanz von fallbasiertem, interaktivem eLearning in der Tiermedizin am Beispiel des CASUS-Systems , 2010, Tierärztliche Praxis K: Kleintiere/Heimtiere.

[18]  Nina Baur,et al.  Stichprobenprobleme bei Online-Umfragen , 2009 .

[19]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[20]  V. Curran,et al.  A review of evaluation outcomes of web‐based continuing medical education , 2005, Medical education.

[21]  MargaryanAnoush,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011 .

[22]  N. Borges,et al.  Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[23]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Research Methodology: Taming the Cyber Frontier , 1999 .

[24]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? , 2001, JAMA.

[25]  Tim Swanwick,et al.  Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to ‘culturism’ , 2005, Medical education.

[26]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[27]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[28]  Liliana Rogozea,et al.  Education, ethics and e-Communication in medicine , 2008 .

[29]  Rolf Schulmeister,et al.  Gibt es eine »Net Generation«? , 2010 .

[30]  Reiner Doluschitz,et al.  Vernetzung tiergesundheitsrelevanter Daten zu einem integrierten Tiergesundheitssystem , 2007, GIL Jahrestagung.

[31]  S. Grzybowski,et al.  Identifying educational influentials for formal and informal continuing medical education in the province of British Columbia , 2000, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[32]  S. May,et al.  Web 2.0 and the veterinary profession: current trends and future implications for lifelong learning , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[33]  Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.  Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys , 2003 .

[34]  T. Konrad,et al.  Transforming Practice Organizations to Foster Lifelong Learning and Commitment to Medical Professionalism , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[35]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  What is the Net Generation? The challenge for future medical education , 2007, Medical teacher.

[36]  J. Sandars,et al.  Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey , 2007, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[37]  Michael D. Kaplowitz,et al.  A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates , 2004 .

[38]  Continuing education in the medical professions: professional development or bureaucratic convenience? , 1997 .

[39]  Lois A. Ritter,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2011 .

[40]  Ken Masters,et al.  For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: A systematic review , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[42]  Heidemarie Hanekop,et al.  PC- und Internetnutzung im Studium aus der Sicht der Studierenden , 2003, Prax. Inf.verarb. Kommun..

[43]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Adult learning in veterinary education: theory to practice. , 2008, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[44]  S. Baillie,et al.  Developing an online professional network for veterinary education: the NOVICE project. , 2011, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[45]  M. Fischer,et al.  CME-Fortbildungsangebote in medizinischen Fachzeitschriften: Strukturqualität der MC-Fragen als Erfolgskontrollen , 2007, Medizinische Klinik.

[46]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education , 2006, BMC medical education.

[47]  J J Norcini,et al.  Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. , 1991, JAMA.

[48]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Antonio-Ramón Bartolomé Pina.  Web 2.0 and New Learning Paradigms , 2008 .

[51]  Phyllis Blumberg,et al.  Why self-directed learning is not learned and practiced in veterinary education. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[52]  Terry Kind,et al.  Social media policies at US medical schools , 2010, Medical education online.

[53]  M. Birnbaum.  Human research and data collection via the internet. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[54]  S. Goldfinger.  Continuing medical education: the case for contamination. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[55]  Die „Netzgeneration“ - Empirische Untersuchungen zur Mediennutzung bei Jugendlichen , 2013 .

[56]  Pauline Cooper,et al.  Educating educators in the purposeful use of Web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning , 2009 .

[57]  R. Gelpi,et al.  Beneficence, justice, and lifelong learning expressed in medical oaths , 2005, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[58]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[59]  Bernd Overwien.  Stichwort: Informelles lernen , 2005 .

[60]  Richard Straub,et al.  Is the world open , 2008 .

[61]  Tayo Babalobi.  Towards a development and use of internet web and information communication technologies for veterinary medicine education in Nigeria , 2006 .

[62]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? , 1999, JAMA.

[63]  J. M. Genn,et al.  AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education – a unifying perspective , 2001, Medical teacher.

[64]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Wiki - Kooperation im Web , 2008, Xpert.press.

[65]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  'Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[66]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .