N400 amplitude does not recover from disappearance after repetitions despite reinitiated semantic integration difficulty

It remains an open question whether the amplitude of N400 reflects combinatory postlexical semantic integration processing. To examine the issue, we repeatedly presented strictly simplified, N400-eliciting three-word structures for seven times, mixed with their plausible counterparts, followed immediately by a much more enriched and informative sentence containing two keywords of the incongruous structure, for the purpose of reinitiating semantic integration processing. Event-related potentials were recorded and compared at the first, fourth, seventh, and eighth time. It was found that multiple repetitions attenuated the N400 effect to almost nonexistent and that the follow-up semantic integration reinitiating sentence did not recover N400 amplitude. The results suggest that combinatory postlexical semantic integration does not significantly modulate N400 amplitude, and provide evidence for noncombinatory processes underlying N400 such as automatic spreading activation and expectancy/prediction.

[1]  M. A. Pozo,et al.  When birds and sias fly: A neural indicator of inferring a word meaning in context. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. Kiefer The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[4]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[5]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: an event-related brain potential study. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Quanhong Wang,et al.  N400 repetition effect in unidentifiable Chinese characters: evidence for automatic process , 2009, Neuroreport.

[7]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading , 2012, Brain and Language.

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[9]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400 , 2011 .

[10]  Yang Yang,et al.  Semantic Processing Persists despite Anomalous Syntactic Category: ERP Evidence from Chinese Passive Sentences , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Integrative and predictive processes in text reading: the N400 across a sentence boundary , 2017 .

[13]  Ping Li,et al.  Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese , 2013, Brain and Language.

[14]  D. Donaldson,et al.  Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[15]  S. Wiens,et al.  Electrocortical N400 Effects of Semantic Satiation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[16]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Á. Tabullo,et al.  ERP correlates of priming in language and stimulus equivalence: evidence of similar N400 effects in absence of semantic content. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  Lauren A. Fromont,et al.  The priming of priming: Evidence that the N400 reflects context-dependent post-retrieval word integration in working memory , 2017, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  C. Petten,et al.  Prospective and retrospective semantic processing: Prediction, time, and relationship strength in event-related potentials , 2014, Brain and Language.

[21]  Jan W. Van Strien,et al.  Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  P. Schumacher,et al.  Event-related brain potentials of masked repetition and semantic priming while listening to sentences , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[26]  M. Traxler,et al.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence , 2015, Cognition.

[27]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Complement Coercion , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Coercion and Compositionality , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A Direct Comparison of N400 Effects of Predictability and Incongruity in Adjective-Noun Combination , 2016 .

[32]  K. Allan,et al.  Is the N400 effect a neurophysiological index of associative relationships? , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[36]  Kara D. Federmeier Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[37]  A. Wagman Event-related Brain Potentials in Man , 1981 .