EEG Signature of Object Categorization from Event-related Potentials

Human visual system recognizes objects in a fast manner and the neural activity of the human brain generates signals which provide information about objects categories seen by the subjects. The brain signals can be recorded using different systems like the electroencephalogram (EEG). The EEG signals carry significant information about the stimuli that stimulate the brain. In order to translate information derived from the EEG for the object recognition mechanism, in this study, twelve various categories were selected as visual stimuli and were presented to the subjects in a controlled task and the signals were recorded through 19-channel EEG recording system. Analysis of signals was performed using two different event-related potential (ERP) computations namely the “target/rest” and “target/non-target” tasks. Comparing ERP of target with rest time indicated that the most involved electrodes in our task were F3, F4, C3, C4, Fz, Cz, among others. ERP of “target/non-target” resulted that in target stimuli two positive peaks occurred about 400 ms and 520 ms after stimulus onset; however, in non-target stimuli only one positive peak appeared about 400 ms after stimulus onset. Moreover, reaction times of subjects were computed and the results showed that the category of flower had the lowest reaction time; however, the stationery category had the maximum reaction time among others. The results provide useful information about the channels and the part of the signals that are affected by different object categories in terms of ERP brain signals. This study can be considered as the first step in the context of human-computer interface applications.

[1]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Nicolas Pinto,et al.  Why is Real-World Visual Object Recognition Hard? , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[5]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Object Location and Object Identity Processing in Spatial Scenes , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[7]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Functional Representation of Living and Nonliving Domains across the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Combined Event-related Potential/Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Corona,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in aging of the brain. , 1982, Advances in neurology.

[9]  Marzia Del Zotto,et al.  The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Identifying Object Categories from Event-Related EEG: Toward Decoding of Conceptual Representations , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  EEG signal processing , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[13]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[14]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Face-Sensitive Processes One Hundred Milliseconds after Picture Onset , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[16]  M. Zotto,et al.  New insights into name category-related effects: is the Age of Acquisition a possible factor? , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[17]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[18]  A. Aarabi,et al.  P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children , 2010 .

[19]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  The earliest EEG signatures of object recognition in a cued-target task are postsensory. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[20]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  S. L. Visser,et al.  Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in senile dementia (Alzheimer type) and in non-organic behavioural disorders in the elderly; comparison with EEG parameters. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Christian Gerlach,et al.  A Review of Functional Imaging Studies on Category Specificity , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  B. Rossion,et al.  Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[24]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[25]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics, EEG, and Cognition , 2006 .

[27]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Coding of Visual Object Features and Feature Conjunctions in the Human Brain , 2008, PloS one.