Statistical models for estimating the genetic basis of repeated measures and other function-valued traits.

The genetic analysis of characters that are best considered as functions of some independent and continuous variable, such as age, can be a complicated matter, and a simple and efficient procedure is desirable. Three methods are common in the literature: random regression, orthogonal polynomial approximation, and character process models. The goals of this article are (i) to clarify the relationships between these methods; (ii) to develop a general extension of the character process model that relaxes correlation stationarity, its most stringent assumption; and (iii) to compare and contrast the techniques and evaluate their performance across a range of actual and simulated data. We find that the character process model, as described in 1999 by Pletcher and Geyer, is the most successful method of analysis for the range of data examined in this study. It provides a reasonable description of a wide range of different covariance structures, and it results in the best models for actual data. Our analysis suggests genetic variance for Drosophila mortality declines with age, while genetic variance is constant at all ages for reproductive output. For growth in beef cattle, however, genetic variance increases linearly from birth, and genetic correlations are high across all observed ages.

[1]  C. Geyer,et al.  The genetic analysis of age-dependent traits: modeling the character process. , 1999, Genetics.

[2]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. , 1994, Genetical research.

[3]  Vicente Núñez-Antón Longitudinal data analysis: non‐stationary error structures and antedependent models , 1997 .

[4]  P. Diggle Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[5]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[6]  L. Skovgaard NONLINEAR MODELS FOR REPEATED MEASUREMENT DATA. , 1996 .

[7]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. , 1990, Biometrics.

[9]  D. Stram,et al.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. , 1994, Biometrics.

[10]  K. Meyer Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[11]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  MEASURING SELECTION AND CONSTRAINT IN THE EVOLUTION OF GROWTH , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  G. Jansen,et al.  Multiple trait random regression test day model for production traits , 1997 .

[13]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test day yields and random regression model. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[15]  E. Vonesh,et al.  Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models. , 1996, Biometrics.

[16]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or ‘repeated’ records by restricted maximum likelihood , 1997 .

[17]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.