Recent advances in rehabilitation

In Western countries 13-14% of the population have some degree of disability.1 The demand for rehabilitation services will increase as evidence accrues for their effectiveness and as more people survive longer with substantial disability. Current evidence strongly supports the provision of well organised, coordinated, multidisciplinary rehabilitation services based on a problem oriented approach.2 In future, specific interventions will be more evidence based, leading to more appropriate use of interventions and more appropriate referrals to specialist services. Rehabilitation has recently seen many practical innovations and new evidence for specific interventions, but the major advances in rehabilitation are conceptual rather than practical. Firstly, the approach to patients has moved from a predominantly medical one to one in which psychological and sociocultural aspects are equally important. Secondly, the need for organised specialist rehabilitation services—for example, for neurological disabilities—is being recognised. This review concentrates on the conceptual basis of rehabilitation and some emerging principles; the scope of rehabilitation is too large to cover all major advances. We chose topics and papers on the basis of our experience. Models of illness are important.3 4 They form the basis for all decisions on the allocation of resources. They can help in the analysis and understanding of clinical cases and can form a framework for the research and planning of intervention, the construction of services, and the design of research. For effective disability services, doctors, healthcare professionals, politicians, and the general public need to understand the models. The international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps (ICIDH) was developed under the auspices of the World Health Organization and was first published in 1980.5 The development of this classification model and its worldwide acceptance is arguably the greatest single advance in the field of rehabilitation. There are many other models of disability and illness,3 …

[1]  S. Whitelaw Measuring Disease , 1996 .

[2]  B. Ford International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  Epidemiology of disabling neurological disease: how and why does disability occur? , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Back schools for non-specific low-back pain. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  D. Walker-Batson,et al.  Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. , 1995, Stroke.

[6]  J. Fries,et al.  Patient education and health promotion can be effective in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. PROPATH Advisory Board. , 1994, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  R. D. de Haan,et al.  Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Michael Oliver,et al.  Social Work with Disabled People , 1983 .

[9]  D. Wade A framework for considering rehabilitation interventions , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[11]  G. A. van den Bos,et al.  The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[14]  J. Nilsson,et al.  A problem-based education program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation after three and twelve months. , 1997, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[15]  D. Wade,et al.  The National Sentinel Audit for Stroke: A Tool for Raising Standards of Care , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  The Short Orientation–Memory–Concentration Test: a study of its reliability and validity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  P. Wood,et al.  The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps of the World Health Organization , 1990 .

[18]  D. Wade,et al.  The impact of an information pack on patients with stroke and their carers: a randomized controlled trial , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Enhancing Occupational Performance through Occupationally Embedded Exercise: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1997 .

[20]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[23]  B. Bioulac,et al.  A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of botulinum toxin in the treatment of spastic foot in hemiparetic patients. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Botulinum toxin type B: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study in cervical dystonia , 1997, Neurology.

[25]  R. P. Fabio,et al.  Extended outpatient rehabilitation: its influence on symptom frequency, fatigue, and functional status for persons with progressive multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[27]  E M Badley,et al.  An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. , 1993, Disability and rehabilitation.

[28]  D. Wade,et al.  Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  D. Wade Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[31]  Langhorne,et al.  Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke , 1997, BMJ.

[32]  A J Thompson,et al.  The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[33]  D. Wade,et al.  Evidence relating to goal planning in rehabilitation , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[34]  C. Granger,et al.  Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Archives of family medicine.

[35]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[36]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.