A role for a complex between activated G protein-coupled receptors in yeast cellular mating

Cell-cell fusion is a fundamental process that facilitates a wide variety of biological events in organisms ranging from yeast to humans. However, relatively little is actually understood with respect to fusion mechanisms. In the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mating of opposite-type cells is triggered by pheromone activation of the G protein-coupled receptors, α-factor receptor (Ste2p) and a-factor receptor (Ste3p), leading to mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, growth arrest, and cellular fusion events. Herein we now provide evidence of a role for these receptors in the later cell fusion stage of mating. In vitro assays demonstrated the ability of the receptors to promote mixing of proteoliposomes containing phosphatidylserine, potentially based on a pheromone-dependent interaction between Ste2p and Ste3p that was confirmed by tandem affinity purification and cellular pull-down assays. The cellular mating activity of Ste2p was subsequently probed in vivo. Notably, a receptor-null yeast strain expressing N-terminally truncated Ste2p yielded a phenotype demonstrating wild-type signaling but arrested mating. The arrested prezygotes showed evidence of some cell wall erosion but no membrane juxtaposition at the fusion site. Further, in vitro analyses correlated this mutation with loss of the interaction between Ste2p and Ste3p and inhibition of related lipid mixing. Overall, these results support a role for a complex between activated yeast pheromone receptors in later cell fusion stages of mating, possibly mediating events at the level of cell wall digestion and membrane juxtaposition before membrane fusion.

[1]  T. Emery,et al.  Peptides , 1964, Peptides.

[2]  Scott Nolan,et al.  Prm1 Prevents Contact-Dependent Lysis of Yeast Mating Pairs , 2004, Eukaryotic Cell.

[3]  L. Marsh,et al.  Role of the ABC transporter Ste6 in cell fusion during yeast conjugation , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  J. Becker,et al.  Significance of C-terminal cysteine modifications to the biological activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae a-factor mating pheromone , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  M. Rose,et al.  Yeast mating: Getting close to membrane merger , 2001, Current Biology.

[6]  D. Papahadjopoulos,et al.  Ca2+-induced fusion of phospholipid vesicles monitored by mixing of aqueous contents , 1979, Nature.

[7]  L. Bardwell A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[8]  M. Kielian Class II virus membrane fusion proteins. , 2006, Virology.

[9]  J. Becker,et al.  Identification of ligand binding regions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-factor pheromone receptor by photoaffinity cross-linking. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[10]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[11]  J. Rizo,et al.  SNARE-mediated lipid mixing depends on the physical state of the vesicles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[12]  L. Hartwell,et al.  S. cerevisiae α pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination , 1991, Cell.

[13]  H. Dohlman,et al.  G proteins and pheromone signaling. , 2002, Annual review of physiology.

[14]  Heidi E. Hamm,et al.  The Many Faces of G Protein Signaling* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  J. Pringle Staining of bud scars and other cell wall chitin with calcofluor. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  R. Macey,et al.  Shape and stability changes in human erythrocyte membranes induced by metal cations. , 1978, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[17]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of the pheromone signal transduction pathway in the chemotropic response to pheromone. , 1997, Genetics.

[18]  Dieter Langosch,et al.  Functions of SNAREs in intracellular membrane fusion and lipid bilayer mixing , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  M. Rose,et al.  Distinct morphological phenotypes of cell fusion mutants. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  Elizabeth H. Chen,et al.  Unveiling the Mechanisms of Cell-Cell Fusion , 2005, Science.

[21]  B. Podbilewicz,et al.  The story of cell fusion: big lessons from little worms. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic mutagenesis of the yeast mating pheromone receptor third intracellular loop. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  M. Rose,et al.  Cell fusion during yeast mating requires high levels of a-factor mating pheromone , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Y. Durocher,et al.  Purification and characterization of a recombinant G-protein-coupled receptor, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ste2p, transiently expressed in HEK293 EBNA1 cells. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[25]  G. Fink,et al.  Fus2 localizes near the site of cell fusion and is required for both cell fusion and nuclear alignment during zygote formation , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  J. Segall,et al.  Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[28]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast , 1989, Nature.

[29]  M. Kozlov,et al.  Protein-lipid interplay in fusion and fission of biological membranes. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  M. Lawrence,et al.  The structural biology of type I viral membrane fusion , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  M. Whiteway,et al.  Overexpression of the STE4 gene leads to mating response in haploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[32]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[33]  J. Rothman,et al.  Cell Fusion: EFF Is Enough , 2005, Current Biology.

[34]  V. Georgiev Virology , 1955, Nature.

[35]  Benedikt Westermann,et al.  SNAREpins: Minimal Machinery for Membrane Fusion , 1998, Cell.

[36]  E. Elion,et al.  Pheromone response, mating and cell biology. , 2000, Current opinion in microbiology.

[37]  D. Koppel,et al.  FUS1 regulates the opening and expansion of fusion pores between mating yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[38]  T. Wolfsberg,et al.  Virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[39]  M. Ikawa,et al.  The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs , 2005, Nature.

[40]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Assay of yeast mating reaction. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[41]  K. Blumer,et al.  Oligomerization, Biogenesis, and Signaling Is Promoted by a Glycophorin A-like Dimerization Motif in Transmembrane Domain 1 of a Yeast G Protein-coupled Receptor* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  Lin Yang,et al.  Observation of a Membrane Fusion Intermediate Structure , 2002, Science.

[43]  Peter Walter,et al.  Prm1p, a Pheromone-Regulated Multispanning Membrane Protein, Facilitates Plasma Membrane Fusion during Yeast Mating , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  A. Touhami,et al.  Liposome reconstitution of a minimal protein‐mediated membrane fusion machine , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[45]  J. Thorner,et al.  Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[46]  A. Brunger,et al.  Neuronal SNAREs do not trigger fusion between synthetic membranes but do promote PEG-mediated membrane fusion. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Protease helps yeast find mating partners , 1998, Nature.

[48]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Mechanisms in Yeast: A Prototypical Sex Machine , 2004, Science.