Functional principles of pattern generation for walking movements of stick insect forelegs: the role of the femoral chordotonal organ afferences

A rampwise stretch of the femoral chordotonal organ is known often to elicit a response in the active decerebrate stick insect that is termed an ‘active reaction’, and which can be considered to represent part of the step cycle. During the first part of the response, the flexor motor neurones are excited and the excitatory extensor motor neurones are inhibited, forming a positive feedback loop. When the chordotonal organ reaches a position corresponding to a flexed femur-tibia joint, the flexor motor neurones are inhibited and the extensor motor neurones are excited. In this study, extracellular and intracellular recordings showed that, during an active reaction, the excitation of the retractor unguis motor neurones usually paralleled that of the flexor motor neurones, whereas the protractor coxae motor neurones were less strongly coupled to this system. The first part of the active reaction occurred only at low stimulus velocities. At high stimulus velocities negative feedback was present. The first part therefore represents some kind of velocity-control-system for active flexions. Electrical stimulation of the nerve containing the axons of trochanteral campaniform sensilla and of the hairfield trHP decreased the likelihood that concurrent chordotonal organ stimulation would elicit an active reaction. Furthermore, most of the active reactions that occurred under these stimulus conditions involved only the flexor tibiae muscle. The results indicate that: the walking pattern generator is composed of subunits that are only loosely coupled centrally; it probably does not include a central pattern generator; and generation of an active reaction is a two-step process.

[1]  C. R. Fourtner,et al.  NERVOUS CONTROL OF WALKING IN THE COCKROACH , 1973 .

[2]  Fachbereich Biologie der Universit Zur Steuerung aktiver Bewegungen des Femur-Tibia-Gelenkes der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus , 1973 .

[3]  K. R. Weiss,et al.  The command neuron concept , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  F. Delcomyn Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals. , 1980, Science.

[5]  A. Lundberg HALF-CENTRES REVISITED , 1981 .

[6]  M. Siegler Posture and history of movement determine membrane potential and synaptic events in nonspiking interneurons and motor neurons of the locust. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  U. Bässler,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of trochanteral campaniform sensilla in the stick insect, Cuniculina impigra , 1982 .

[8]  U. Bässler,et al.  Motor Output of the Denervated Thoracic Ventral Nerve Cord in the Stick Insect Carausius Morosus , 1983 .

[9]  Professor Dr. Ulrich Bässler Neural Basis of Elementary Behavior in Stick Insects , 1983, Studies of Brain Function.

[10]  M. Siegler,et al.  Local Interneurones and Local Interactions in Arthropods , 1984 .

[11]  H. Cruse Which Parameters Control the Leg Movement of a Walking Insect?: I. Velocity Control during the Stance Phase , 1985 .

[12]  U. Bässler,et al.  Physiology of the Femoral Chordotonal Organ in the Stick Insect, Cuniculina Impigra , 1985 .

[13]  Malcolm Burrows,et al.  Nonspiking and Spiking Local Interneurons in the Locust , 1985 .

[14]  Ulrich Bässler,et al.  THE INHERENT WALKING DIRECTION DIFFERS FOR THE PROTHORACIC AND METATHORACIC LEGS OF STICK INSECTS , 1985 .

[15]  U. T. Koch,et al.  Acceleration Receptors in the Femoral Chordotonal Organ of the Stick Insect, Cuniculina Impigra , 1985 .

[16]  H. Cruse Which parameters control the leg movement of a walking insect? II: The start of the swing phase , 1985 .

[17]  M. Burrows,et al.  Innervation patterns of inhibitory motor neurones in the thorax of the locust. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  K. G. Pearson,et al.  Are there Central Pattern Generators for Walking and Flight in Insects , 1985 .

[19]  H. Cruse Coactivating Influences Between Neighbouring Legs in Walking Insects , 1985 .

[20]  U. Bässler,et al.  Motoneurone im Meso- und Metathorakalganglion der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus , 1986 .

[21]  U. Bässler,et al.  Assisting components within a resistance reflex of the stick insect, Cuniculina impigra , 1986 .

[22]  U. Bässler,et al.  Response characteristics of single trochanteral campaniform sensilla in the stick insect, Cuniculina impigra , 1986 .

[23]  K. Sillar,et al.  Phase-dependent reversal of reflexes mediated by the thoracocoxal muscle receptor organ in the crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  S. Zill A model of pattern generation of cockroach walking reconsidered. , 1986, Journal of neurobiology.

[25]  U. Bssler Afferent control of walking movements in the stick insectCuniculina impigra: II. Reflex reversal and the release of the swing phase in the restrained foreleg , 1986 .

[26]  K. Sillar,et al.  Two identified afferent neurones entrain a central locomotor rhythm generator , 1986, Nature.

[27]  Afferent control of walking movements in the stick insectCuniculina impigra: I. Decerebrated animals on a treadband , 1986 .

[28]  G. Weiland,et al.  Sensory Feedback During Active Movements of Stick Insects , 1987 .

[29]  M. Burrows Parallel processing of proprioceptive signals by spiking local interneurons and motor neurons in the locust , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  U. Bassler,et al.  Motor output oscillations in denervated thoracic ganglia of walking stick insects , 1987 .

[31]  S. Iversen Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Dean Control of leg protraction in the stick insect: a targeted movement showing compensation for externally applied forces , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  U. Bässler,et al.  Leg movements of stick insects walking with five legs on a treadwheel and with one leg on a motor-driven belt , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  U. Bässler Afferent control of walking movements in the stick insectCuniculina impigra , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  H. Cruse,et al.  Systemanalytische Untersuchung eines aufgeschnittenen Regelkreises, der die Beinstellung der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus kontrolliert: Kraftmessungen an den Antagonisten Flexor und Extensor tibiae , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  D. Graham Effects of circum-oesophageal lesion on the behaviour of the stick insect Carausius morosus , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  U. Bässler Timing and shaping influences on the motor output for walking in stick insects , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.