(Prosodic-) Structural Constraints on Gapping in Turkish

This study investigates string-identical gapping constructions with different prosodic phrasings and reports the results of a perception test that seeks to pinpoint the prosodic constraints on gapping constructions. We suggest that unacceptability judgments for Forward Gapping (FG) and Backward Gapping (BG) cannot be analyzed purely through word-order restrictions. The information structural status of the shared, discourse-given constituent and the prominent contrastive constituents play a crucial role. Phonological phrasing patterns, induced by information structural units, interplay with word order restrictions and save the structures noted as unacceptable in the literature. The findings indicate that prosody does not work on the output of syntax but works in tandem with syntactic mechanism. This study further reveals that FG and BG cannot be variations of the same derivational mechanism and we propose a copy analysis for FG, and Multiple Dominance (MD) analysis for BG.

[1]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Multiple focus in Mandarin Chinese , 2011 .

[2]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Order and structure , 1996 .

[3]  A. Sumru Özsoy,et al.  dA: a focus/topic associated clitic in Turkish , 2003 .

[4]  Jaklin Kornfilt.  Remarks on Some Word Order Facts and Turkish Coordination with Identical Verb Ellipsis , 2010 .

[5]  Susanne Winkler,et al.  Edges and Gaps: Contrast at the Interfaces , 2010 .

[6]  A. Emre.  Yeni bir gramer metodu hakkında layıha , 1931 .

[7]  Hiroto Hoshi,et al.  Directionality of movement in Ellipsis Resolution in English and Japanese , 1999 .

[8]  Ad Neeleman,et al.  The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast : an interface-based approach , 2012 .

[9]  Irene Vogel,et al.  The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish , 2001, Phonology.

[10]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[12]  Chris Fox,et al.  The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory: Lappin/The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[13]  Eser Emine Erguvanlı.  The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar , 1984 .

[14]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[15]  J. Abe.  Ellipsis : Deletion, copying or both? , 1996 .

[16]  Mara Frascarelli,et al.  The phonology of Focus and Topic in Italian , 1997 .

[17]  Jorge E. Hankamer,et al.  Constraints on deletion in syntax , 1972 .

[18]  Jairo Nunes.  Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .

[19]  Beste Kamali Aknoun Azad.  Topics at the PF Interface of Turkish , 2011 .

[20]  Andreas Nolda,et al.  A phono-syntactic template for Turkish: Base-generating free word order , 2011 .

[21]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[22]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  In Search of the English Middle Field , 2004 .

[23]  Noah Constant,et al.  Contrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations , 2014 .

[24]  A. Ince.  Dimensions of Ellipsis: Investigations in Turkish , 2009 .

[25]  Daeho Chung.  A Multiple Dominance Analysis of Right Node Sharing Constructions , 2004 .