INTRODUCTION Common surgical approaches for medial maxillectomy include lateral rhinotomy and midfacial degloving. Lateral rhinotomy provides an excellent surgical exposure but leaves a prominent scar on the face. Midfacial degloving has been preferred to lateral rhinotomy because it does not leave any external scars on the face, although midfacial degloving has its own limitations. For example, vestibular stenosis is a significant complication that can occur, and the bilateral exposure of the midface may be unnecessary in medial maxillectomy for most unilateral lesions. Several modifications of midfacial degloving have been reported in an attempt to avoid vestibular stenosis. We have designed another modification of midfacial degloving to avoid unnecessary exposure of the healthy side of the midface, as well as vestibular stenosis. The procedure involves a gingivobuccal incision across the midline, a septal transfixion incision, a pyriform aperture incision, and a lateral osteotomy along the frontal process of the maxilla to the nasion. We termed our modification the hemifacial degloving approach. We have performed 12 cases of medial maxillectomy using this hemifacial degloving approach. We present the procedures and the results.
[1]
B. Jafek,et al.
A Modification of the Midface Degloving Technique
,
1999,
The Laryngoscope.
[2]
A. J. Maniglia,et al.
Midfacial degloving for the management of nasal, sinus, and skull-base neoplasms.
,
1995,
Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.
[3]
P. Bonding,et al.
Modified midfacial degloving. A practical approach to extensive bilateral benign tumours of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
,
1995,
Rhinology.
[4]
D. Kennedy,et al.
The versatile midface degloving approach
,
1988,
The Laryngoscope.
[5]
A. J. Maniglia.
Indications and techniques of midfacial degloving. A 15-year experience.
,
1986,
Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.
[6]
J. Converse,et al.
The midface degloving procedure.
,
1974,
Plastic and reconstructive surgery.