Cross-Optimization Aspects Concerning the Extended Symmetrical Optimum Method

Abstract The paper presents cross-optimization aspects in controller parameter tuning in the case of the Extended Symmetrical Optimum (briefly, ESO) method - introduced by the authors (Preitl and Precup, 1996, 1999a) - for a class of systems characterized by an open-loop transfer function H 0 (s): H 0 ( s ) = k 0 ( 1 + sTc ) s 2 ( 1 + sT ∑ ) . The following optimization criteria were taken into consideration: - ISE–I 2e I 2e = ∫ 0 ∞ e 2 ( t ) dt , - generalized ISE – I 2g : I 2 g = ∫ 0 ∞ e 2 ( t ) + τ 2 e . 2 ( t ) dt , - cross-optimization criterion (index) – I 2c I 2 c = ∫ 0 ∞ e 2 ( t ) + ρ 2 u 2 ( t ) dt . Generally speaking, it is relatively difficult to express these three indices and the obtained results are not conclusive. It is proved in the paper that the generalization of the Symmetrical Optimum (SO) method to the form of ESO method determines that the use of the indices I 2e , I 2g and I 2c becomes no more necessary.

[1]  D. Graham,et al.  The synthesis of "optimum" transient response: Criteria and standard forms , 1953, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry.

[2]  Stefan Preitl,et al.  An extension of tuning relations after symmetrical optimum method for PI and PID controllers , 1999, Autom..