Property rights as a complex adaptive system: how entrepreneurship transforms intellectual property structures

This article aims to provide some elements of an evolutionary theory of property rights. It applies a systems-based capital-theoretic perspective to explain the formation and transformation of property rights structures. The approach emphasizes how entrepreneurs create capital combinations by connecting capital goods—defined widely to include property rights, such as patents—in their production plans. Their actions change complementarity relations between property rights as used in production. We treat the property rights structure as a complex adaptive system that exhibits increasing structural complexity as it evolves. Entrepreneurs discover gaps in the property rights system. As they organize production to exploit profit opportunities, entrepreneurs regroup existing intellectual property rights (IPR) into new modules, such as patent pools, that encapsulate more complex combinations of basic building blocks of intellectual property. A patent pool constitutes an interpolation of a new meso level within the macro IPR structure. We apply our framework to the first of the patent pools for digital video compression technology used in digital television and DVDs.

[1]  Érica Gorga,et al.  Knowledge Inputs, Legal Institutions and Firm Structure: Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[2]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[3]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[4]  Jason Potts,et al.  The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour , 2001 .

[5]  David A. Harper Property rights, entrepreneurship and coordination , 2013 .

[6]  Robert C. Ellickson Order without law : how neighbors settle disputes , 2009 .

[7]  Gillian K. Hadfield Legal Infrastructure and the New Economy , 2012 .

[8]  S. Winter Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[9]  Jason Potts,et al.  The General Theory of Economic Evolution , 2007 .

[10]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Nature of Capital and Income , 1965 .

[11]  Jason Potts,et al.  Micro-meso-macro , 2004 .

[12]  David A. Harper,et al.  Intellectual Property as a Complex Adaptive System , 2015 .

[13]  John Foster,et al.  Introduction: co-evolution and complex adaptive systems in evolutionary economics , 2014 .

[14]  M. Ricketts Rent Seeking, Entrepreneurship, Subjectivism, and Property Rights , 1987 .

[15]  J. B. Ruhl,et al.  Law's Complexity - A Primer , 2008 .

[16]  David A. Harper,et al.  The kinetics of capital formation and economic organisation , 2012 .

[17]  L. Lachmann,et al.  Capital and its structure , 1956 .

[18]  E. Ottoz,et al.  Choosing the scope of trade secret law when secrets complement patents , 2011 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[20]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[21]  David A. Harper,et al.  The anatomy of emergence, with a focus upon capital formation , 2012 .

[22]  Petra Moser,et al.  Patent Pools and the Direction of Innovation - Evidence from the 19th-Century Sewing Machine Industry , 2011 .

[23]  H. Demsetz Toward a Theory of Property Rights , 1967 .

[24]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[25]  S. Triest,et al.  Valuing patents on cost-reducing technology: A case study , 2007 .

[26]  Thomas W. Merrill,et al.  Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle , 2000 .

[27]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[28]  David A. Harper,et al.  Capital as a layer cake: A systems approach to capital and its multi-level structure , 2010 .

[29]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups , 2013, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[30]  J. Foster From simplistic to complex systems in economics , 2005 .

[31]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[32]  D. Teece The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[33]  James M. Buchanan,et al.  Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons* , 2000, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[34]  R. Posner,et al.  Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis , 1976, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[35]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[36]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Kenneth Flamm A Tale of Two Standards: Patent Pools and Innovation in the Optical Disk Drive Industry , 2013 .

[38]  Y. Barzel Economic analysis of property rights , 1989 .

[39]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[40]  M. Heller,et al.  The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets , 1998 .