On Modeling Some Aspects of Higher Level Vision

This paper outlines several intertwined modeling projects concerning various aspects of higher level vision. A model of visual priming is presented, followed by an account of “top down” visual expectation or hypothesis testing as a kind of self-priming, closely associated with the calling up of visual imagery. Several preprocessing mechanisms are then introduced that might account for the relative ease with which we can identify objects and patterns independently of viewpoint.

[1]  M. L. Rossen,et al.  Experiments with Representation in Neural Networks: Object Motion, Speech, and Arithmetic , 1990 .

[2]  J.A. Anderson,et al.  Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. , 1984 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed model of human learning and memory , 1986 .

[4]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Allen Selverston,et al.  Flexibility of computational units in invertebrate CPGs , 1989 .

[6]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[8]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Bruner On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[11]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .

[12]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  James A. Anderson Why, Having So Many Neurons, Do We Have So Few Thoughts? , 1991 .

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[16]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[17]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming of Nonverbal Information and the Nature of Implicit Memory , 1990 .

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  TRAFFIC: Recognizing Objects Using Hierarchical Reference Frame Transformations , 1989, NIPS.

[19]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[20]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Speed of size scaling in human vision , 1972 .

[21]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Vision: The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception , 1990 .

[22]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Induction of synaptic plasticity by Hebbian covariance in the Hippocampus , 1989 .

[23]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.