Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia

Significance Demand for agricultural commodities is the leading driver of tropical deforestation. Many corporations have pledged to eliminate forest loss from their supply chains by purchasing only certified “sustainable” products. To evaluate whether certification fulfills such pledges, we applied statistical analyses to satellite-based estimates of tree cover loss to infer the causal impact of a third-party certification system on deforestation and fire within Indonesian oil palm plantations. We found that certification significantly reduced deforestation, but not fire or peatland clearance, among participating plantations. Moreover, certification was mostly adopted in older plantations that contained little remaining forest. Broader adoption by oil palm growers is likely needed for certification to have a large impact on total forest area lost to oil palm expansion. Many major corporations and countries have made commitments to purchase or produce only “sustainable” palm oil, a commodity responsible for substantial tropical forest loss. Sustainability certification is the tool most used to fulfill these procurement policies, and around 20% of global palm oil production was certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in 2017. However, the effect of certification on deforestation in oil palm plantations remains unclear. Here, we use a comprehensive dataset of RSPO-certified and noncertified oil palm plantations (∼188,000 km2) in Indonesia, the leading producer of palm oil, as well as annual remotely sensed metrics of tree cover loss and fire occurrence, to evaluate the impact of certification on deforestation and fire from 2001 to 2015. While forest loss and fire continued after RSPO certification, certified palm oil was associated with reduced deforestation. Certification lowered deforestation by 33% from a counterfactual of 9.8 to 6.6% y−1. Nevertheless, most plantations contained little residual forest when they received certification. As a result, by 2015, certified areas held less than 1% of forests remaining within Indonesian oil palm plantations. Moreover, certification had no causal impact on forest loss in peatlands or active fire detection rates. Broader adoption of certification in forested regions, strict requirements to avoid all peat, and routine monitoring of clearly defined forest cover loss in certified and RSPO member-held plantations appear necessary if the RSPO is to yield conservation and climate benefits from reductions in tropical deforestation.

[1]  E. Lambin,et al.  Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Justice,et al.  The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products , 2016, Remote sensing of environment.

[3]  M. Cappelletti Who watches the watchmen?: a comparative study on judicial responsibility , 1983 .

[4]  M. Maslin,et al.  Sustainability: Choose satellites to monitor deforestation , 2013, Nature.

[5]  H. K. Gibbs,et al.  Brazil's Soy Moratorium , 2015, Science.

[6]  Elizabeth T. Kennedy,et al.  An agenda for assessing and improving conservation impacts of sustainability standards in tropical agriculture , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  S. Henders,et al.  Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities , 2015 .

[8]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy , 2009 .

[9]  Pablo Pacheco,et al.  Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion in Borneo , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Charles H. Cannon,et al.  Environmental correlates of tree biomass, basal area, wood specific gravity and stem density gradients in Borneo's tropical forests , 2010 .

[11]  R. DeFries,et al.  Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Milledge,et al.  Demand-side interventions to reduce deforestation and forest degradation , 2013 .

[13]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  What Does Zero Deforestation Mean? , 2013, Science.

[14]  Petr Keil,et al.  Comment on “High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change” , 2014, Science.

[15]  B. Cashore,et al.  Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance , 2011 .

[16]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Social and Environmental Impacts of Forest Management Certification in Indonesia , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Belinda A. Margono,et al.  Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012 , 2014 .

[18]  J. Swenson,et al.  Early Days in the Certification of Logging Concessions : Estimating FSC ' s Deforestation Impact in Peru and Cameroon , 2015 .

[19]  G. Daily,et al.  Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. , 2000, Science.

[20]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations , 2013 .

[22]  R. DeFries,et al.  Fire emissions and regional air quality impacts from fires in oil palm, timber, and logging concessions in Indonesia , 2015 .

[23]  N. Thomas,et al.  Eco-certification and coffee cultivation enhance tree cover and forest connectivity in the Colombian coffee landscapes , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[24]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Randerson,et al.  Climate regulation of fire emissions and deforestation in equatorial Asia , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Consistent results in stream hydrology across multiple watersheds: A reply to Chew and Goh , 2015 .

[27]  Belinda A. Margono,et al.  Mapping and monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in Sumatra (Indonesia) using Landsat time series data sets from 1990 to 2010 , 2012 .

[28]  S. N. Trigg,et al.  Lowland Forest Loss in Protected Areas of Indonesian Borneo , 2004, Science.

[29]  J. Vel,et al.  Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia's Outer Islands , 2012 .

[30]  Eric Armijo,et al.  Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains , 2014, Science.

[31]  Allen Blackman,et al.  Producer‐Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  R. DeFries,et al.  Effectiveness of Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) for reducing fires on oil palm concessions in Indonesia from 2012 to 2015 , 2016 .

[33]  D. Morton,et al.  Managing fire risk during drought: the influence of certification and El Niño on fire-driven forest conversion for oil palm in Southeast Asia , 2017 .

[34]  G. Gereffi,et al.  Global value chains and agrifood standards: Challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  L. Curran,et al.  Influence of watershed‐climate interactions on stream temperature, sediment yield, and metabolism along a land use intensity gradient in Indonesian Borneo , 2014 .

[36]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Land cover distribution in the peatlands of Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo in 2015 with changes since 1990 , 2016 .

[37]  S. Page,et al.  Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss , 2015 .

[38]  Rhett Butler,et al.  Improving the Performance of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil for Nature Conservation , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[39]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[40]  Kurt B. Waldman,et al.  Limitations of Certification and Supply Chain Standards for Environmental Protection in Commodity Crop Production , 2014 .

[41]  P. Noojipady,et al.  Assessing the potential additionality of certification by the Round table on Responsible Soybeans and the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil , 2016 .

[42]  H. Gibbs,et al.  Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero‐Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? , 2016 .

[43]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Forests, Livelihoods, and Conservation: Broadening the Empirical Base , 2014 .

[44]  J. Metzger,et al.  Does certification improve biodiversity conservation in Brazilian coffee farms , 2015 .

[45]  Kelly W. Jones,et al.  Estimating the Counterfactual Impact of Conservation Programs on Land Cover Outcomes: The Role of Matching and Panel Regression Techniques , 2015, PloS one.

[46]  Leonard Goff,et al.  Does Eco-Certification Stem Tropical Deforestation? Forest Stewardship Council Certification in Mexico , 2015 .

[47]  Deborah Lawrence,et al.  Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.