Ethnicity and prediction of cardiovascular disease: performance of QRISK2 and Framingham scores in a UK tri-ethnic prospective cohort study (SABRE—Southall And Brent REvisited)

Objective To evaluate QRISK2 and Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores in a tri-ethnic UK population. Design Cohort study. Setting West London. Participants Randomly selected from primary care lists. Follow-up data were available for 87% of traced participants, comprising 1866 white Europeans, 1377 South Asians, and 578 African Caribbeans, aged 40–69 years at baseline (1998–1991). Main outcome measures First CVD events: myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, angina, transient ischaemic attack or stroke reported by participant, primary care or hospital records or death certificate. Results During follow-up, 387 CVD events occurred in men (14%) and 78 in women (8%). Both scores underestimated risk in European and South Asian women (ratio of predicted to observed risk: European women: QRISK2: 0.73, Framingham: 0.73; South Asian women: QRISK2: 0.52, Framingham: 0.43). In African Caribbeans, Framingham over-predicted in men and women and QRISK2 over-predicted in women. Framingham classified 28% of participants as high risk, predicting 54% of all such events. QRISK2 classified 19% as high risk, predicting 42% of all such events. Both scores performed poorly in identifying high risk African Caribbeans; QRISK2 and Framingham identified as high risk only 10% and 24% of those who experienced events. Conclusions Neither score performed consistently well in all ethnic groups. Further validation of QRISK2 in other multi-ethnic datasets, and better methods for identifying high risk African Caribbeans and South Asian women, are required.

[1]  G. Assmann,et al.  Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study , 2002, Circulation.

[2]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a web-based risk score for seven British black and minority ethnic groups , 2006, Heart.

[3]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men:prospective cohort study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations? The PRIME Study. , 2003, European heart journal.

[5]  A. Jones,et al.  Ethnicity and risk factors for coronary heart disease in diabetes mellitus , 2000, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[6]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Predicting the 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2 , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  N. Crichton,et al.  Methods for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in a UK black population , 2012, Heart.

[8]  K. Anderson,et al.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  Nish Chaturvedi,et al.  Southall And Brent REvisited: Cohort profile of SABRE, a UK population-based comparison of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people of European, Indian Asian and African Caribbean origins. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Patrick Royston,et al.  A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  J. Robson,et al.  Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease , 2007, Heart.

[12]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2 , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Yulia V. Marchenko Estimating Variance Components in Stata , 2006 .

[14]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  G. Watt,et al.  The accuracy of the Framingham risk-score in different socioeconomic groups: a prospective study. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  J. Ekoé,et al.  Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 2019, Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases.

[17]  N. Cook,et al.  Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score. , 2007, JAMA.

[18]  R. Lloyd‐Mostyn National service framework for coronary heart disease , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  K Sproston,et al.  Health Survey for England 2004. The health of minority ethnic groups. , 2006 .

[20]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  N. Paynter,et al.  C-Reactive Protein and Parental History Improve Global Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: The Reynolds Risk Score for Men , 2008, Circulation.

[22]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Explained Variation for Survival Models , 2006 .

[23]  M. Woodward,et al.  Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) , 2005, Heart.

[24]  C. Fischbacher,et al.  Mortality from all causes and circulatory disease by country of birth in England and Wales 2001-2003. , 2007, Journal of public health.

[25]  Application of Framingham risk estimates to ethnic minorities in United Kingdom and implications for primary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cross sectional population based study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  R. Burrow,et al.  Heart , 2013, Feline Soft Tissue and General Surgery.