An apparatus and a method for determining the slip resistance of shoes and floors by simulation of human foot motions.

An apparatus to measure the coefficient of kinetic friction (mu k) between the shoe sole and the underfoot surface was constructed, and a method including criteria to evaluate the risk of slipping during walking was developed. The apparatus is a prototype stationary step simulator capable of simulating the movements of a human foot and the forces applied to the underfoot surface during an actual slip, and the drainage capability of the contact surface between the shoe sole and the flooring when different lubricants or contaminants are used. The apparatus consists of a movable artificial foot controlled by a computer with the aid of three hydraulic cylinders. The frictional force (F mu), the normal force (FN) and their ratio (mu k = F mu/FN) are measured with a two-way force platform when the foot slides along its surface. Two separate gait patterns, heel-side (mu k 1) and sole-slide (mu k 2) gait pattern, are used for the evaluations. The method classifies studied shoe, lubricant and underfoot surface combinations into five slip resistance classes according to the measured mu k 1. The slip resistance assessments are specified with some complementary safety criteria, e.g., the ratio mu k 1/mu k 2. The reliability of the developed measurement method was assessed in an international comparison test. According to available results discussed in this paper, our method seems to be valid and the slip resistance measurements seem to be repeatable.

[1]  D. P. Manning,et al.  Deaths and injuries caused by slipping, tripping and falling. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[2]  D. I. James A Broader Look at Pedestrian Friction , 1980 .

[3]  Risto Honkanen The role of slippery weather in accidental falls , 1982 .

[4]  Sven Carlsöö,et al.  A METHOD FOR STUDYING WALKING ON DIFFERENT SURFACES , 1962 .

[5]  R Andersson,et al.  Accident data in the new Swedish information system on occupational injuries. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[6]  L Strandberg,et al.  The effect of conditions underfoot on falling and overexertion accidents. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[7]  C H BARNETT,et al.  The phases of human gait. , 1956, Lancet.

[8]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  FOOTWEAR FRICTION ASSESSED BY WALKING EXPERIMENTS , 1985 .

[9]  L Strandberg,et al.  On accident analysis and slip-resistance measurement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[10]  R. Skiba Sicherheitsgrenzwerte zur Vermeidung des Ausgleitens auf Fussböden , 1988 .

[11]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[12]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of slip-resistance measurement devices , 1985 .

[13]  H. Aalto,et al.  Postural control in the oldest olds. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[14]  D. I. James Rubbers and plastics in shoes and flooring: the importance of kinetic friction , 1983 .

[15]  Craig Jones,et al.  The incidence of underfoot accidents during 1985 in a working population of 10,000 Merseyside people , 1988 .

[16]  Murray Mp,et al.  Gait as a total pattern of movement. , 1967 .

[17]  M Tisserand,et al.  Progress in the prevention of falls caused by slipping. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[18]  P. J. Perkins,et al.  Measurement of Slip Between the Shoe and Ground During Walking , 1978 .

[19]  M. P. Wilson,et al.  Slip resistance testing of shoes — new developments , 1983 .

[20]  E. Rabinowicz Stick and Slip , 1956 .