The largest aftershock: How strong, how far away, how delayed?

[1] Proposed in the 1950's, Bath's law states that the largest aftershock has a magnitude that is typically 1.2 less than that of the mainshock. Thirty years of the global earthquake catalog allow us to extend Bath's law in time, space and focal mechanism. On average, reverse faults have a smaller magnitude and distance from the mainshock to largest aftershock than strike-slip faults. The distribution of the time intervals between mainshocks and their largest aftershocks obeys power law, but with a somewhat faster rate of decay than for aftershocks, in general. This implies that the largest aftershocks are more likely to occur earlier rather than later in a given sequence of aftershocks.

[1]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering , 2004, physics/0407018.

[3]  Markus Båth,et al.  Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle , 1965 .

[4]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  An introduction to probability theory , 1968 .

[5]  L. Knopoff,et al.  The magnitude distribution of declustered earthquakes in Southern California. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  K. Aki,et al.  Quantitative Seismology, 2nd Ed. , 2002 .

[7]  T. Parsons,et al.  On near‐source earthquake triggering , 2009 .

[8]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Likelihood analysis of earthquake catalogues , 1991 .

[9]  M. Wyss,et al.  Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes , 2005, Nature.

[10]  A. Helmstetter Is earthquake triggering driven by small earthquakes? , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[12]  T. Utsu,et al.  43 - Statistical Features of Seismicity , 2002 .

[13]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Ian G. Main,et al.  EARTHQUAKES AS CRITICAL PHENOMENA - IMPLICATIONS FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[15]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality and Earthquakes , 1989 .

[16]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems , 2003 .

[17]  P. Reasenberg Second‐order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982 , 1985 .

[18]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Båth's law and the self‐similarity of earthquakes , 2003 .

[19]  D. Sornette,et al.  Mainshocks are aftershocks of conditional foreshocks: How do foreshock statistical properties emerge from aftershock laws , 2002, cond-mat/0205499.

[20]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  The physics of earthquakes , 2001 .

[21]  Olivier Lengliné,et al.  A new estimation of the decay of aftershock density with distance to the mainshock , 2010 .

[22]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  A Common Origin for Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Multiplets , 2002 .

[23]  Yun‐tai Chen,et al.  International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology , 2004 .

[24]  Distribution of the largest aftershocks in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of the universal Båth law. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  G. Brietzke,et al.  Quantitative earthquake forecasts resulting from static stress triggering , 2010 .

[26]  D. Sornette,et al.  Importance of direct and indirect triggered seismicity in the ETAS model of seismicity , 2003, physics/0303070.

[27]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Frequency of Earthquakes in California , 1944, Nature.

[28]  R. Stein The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence , 1999, Nature.

[29]  D. Vere-Jones A limit theorem with application to Båth's law in seismology , 2008, Advances in Applied Probability.

[30]  T. Utsu A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. , 1961 .

[31]  D. Vere-Jones A note on the statistical interpretation of Båth's law , 1969 .

[32]  D. Marsan,et al.  Extending Earthquakes' Reach Through Cascading , 2008, Science.

[33]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Earthquake Forecasting in Diverse Tectonic Zones of the Globe , 2010 .

[34]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[35]  P. Bak,et al.  Earthquakes as a self‐organized critical phenomenon , 1989 .

[36]  Sebastian Hainzl,et al.  Dependence of the Omori‐Utsu law parameters on main shock magnitude: Observations and modeling , 2007 .

[37]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Båth's law derived from the Gutenberg-Richter law and from aftershock properties , 2003 .

[38]  A. Freed EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING BY STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND POSTSEISMIC STRESS TRANSFER , 2005 .

[39]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Scaling Properties of the Parkfield Aftershock Sequence , 2006 .

[40]  D. Amorèse Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions , 2007 .

[41]  G. King,et al.  STATIC STRESS CHANGES AND THE TRIGGERING OF EARTHQUAKES , 1994 .

[42]  Charles M. Grinstead,et al.  Introduction to probability , 1999, Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences.

[43]  K. Felzer,et al.  Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress , 2006, Nature.