A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS 1

The term flashiness reflects the frequency and rapidi- ty of short term changes in streamflow, especially during runoff events. Flashiness is an important component of a stream's hydro- logic regime. A variety of land use and land management changes may lead to increased or decreased flashiness, often to the detri- ment of aquatic life. This paper presents a newly developed flashi- ness index, which is based on mean daily flows. The index is calculated by dividing the pathlength of flow oscillations for a time interval (i.e., the sum of the absolute values of day-to-day changes in mean daily flow) by total discharge during that time interval. This index has low interannual variability, relative to most flow regime indicators, and thus greater power to detect trends. Index values were calculated for 515 Midwestern streams for the 27-year period from 1975 through 2001. Statistically significant increases were present in 22 percent of the streams, primarily in the eastern portion of the study area, while decreases were present in 9 per- cent, primarily in the western portion. Index values tend to decrease with increasing watershed area and with increasing unit area ground water inputs. Area compensated index values often shift at ecoregion boundaries. Potential index applications include evaluation of programs to restore more natural flow regimes. (KEY TERMS: stream flashiness; flashiness index; Indicators of Hydrological Alteration; surface water hydrology; watershed man- agement; stormwater management; agricultural hydrology.)

[1]  D. Baker,et al.  Effects of Watershed Scale on Agrochemical Concentration Patterns in Midwestern Streams , 2000 .

[2]  N. Poff,et al.  A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale‐dependence in some hydrological descriptors , 1996 .

[3]  Dale M. Robertson,et al.  Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams , 1999 .

[4]  T. Green,et al.  Fractal-based scaling and scale-invariant dispersion of peak concentrations of crop protection chemicals in rivers. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Trends in agriculture in the LEASEQ watersheds, 1975-1995. Lake Erie Agricultural Systems for Environmental Quality. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[6]  K. Potter Hydrological impacts of changing land management practices in a moderate‐sized agricultural catchment , 1991 .

[7]  K. Schilling,et al.  INCREASED BASEFLOW IN IOWA OVER THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY 1 , 2003 .

[8]  R. Sparks,et al.  The Natural Flow Regime , 2006 .

[9]  Francis J. Magilligan,et al.  LONG‐TERM CHANGES IN REGIONAL HYDROLOGIC REGIME FOLLOWING IMPOUNDMENT IN A HUMID‐CLIMATE WATERSHED 1 , 2001 .

[10]  IDENTIFICATION OF CHANGES IN STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS 1 , 2001 .

[11]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  Measures of Flow Variability and a New Flow-Based Classification of Great Lakes Tributaries , 1990 .

[12]  Robert G. Bailey,et al.  DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN WATERSHEDS AND ECOREGIONS 1 , 1997 .

[13]  G. Matisoff,et al.  The Lake Erie Agricultural Systems for Environmental Quality project: an introduction. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[14]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[15]  D. Baker,et al.  The Lake Erie agroecosystem program: water quality assessments , 1993 .

[16]  David B Baker,et al.  Trends in water quality in LEASEQ rivers and streams (northwestern Ohio), 1975-1995. Lake Erie Agricultural Systems for Environmental Quality. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[17]  William L. Graf,et al.  Damage Control: Restoring the Physical Integrity of America’s Rivers , 2001 .

[18]  Brian Richter,et al.  A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network , 1998 .

[19]  J. Omernik Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[20]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[21]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .