Optimal study design with identical power: an application of power equivalence to latent growth curve models.

Structural equation models have become a broadly applied data-analytic framework. Among them, latent growth curve models have become a standard method in longitudinal research. However, researchers often rely solely on rules of thumb about statistical power in their study designs. The theory of power equivalence provides an analytical answer to the question of how design factors, for example, the number of observed indicators and the number of time points assessed in repeated measures, trade off against each other while holding the power for likelihood-ratio tests on the latent structure constant. In this article, we present applications of power-equivalent transformations on a model with data from a previously published study on cognitive aging, and highlight consequences of participant attrition on power.

[1]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  General Longitudinal Modeling of Individual Differences in Experimental Designs: A Latent Variable Framework for Analysis and Power Estimation , 1997 .

[2]  K. Murphy,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Second Ediction , 1998 .

[3]  T. Little,et al.  On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. , 1999 .

[4]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Decline in life satisfaction in old age: longitudinal evidence for links to distance-to-death. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[5]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[6]  B. Muthén,et al.  How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power , 2002 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Longitudinal Cognition-Survival Relations in Old and Very Old Age 13-Year Data from the Berlin Aging Study , 2006 .

[10]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[11]  S. Hershberger,et al.  A Simple Rule for Generating Equivalent Models in Covariance Structure Modeling. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[12]  D. Wegener,et al.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  J. Mcardle.  Dynamic but Structural Equation Modeling of Repeated Measures Data , 1988 .

[14]  Timo von Oertzen,et al.  Power equivalence in structural equation modelling. , 2010 .

[15]  Julia A. M. Delius,et al.  Längsschnittliche Datenerhebungen der Berliner Altersstudie (BASE) : Studiendesign, Stichproben und Forschungsthemen 1990-2009 , 2010 .

[16]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: gauging the evidence for a common cause. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[17]  S. Penev,et al.  Maximal reliability and power in covariance structure models. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[18]  R Kliegl,et al.  Speed and intelligence in old age. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[19]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[20]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A Note on the Relationship Between the Number of Indicators and Their Reliability in Detecting Regression Coefficients in Latent Regression Analysis , 2004 .

[21]  Paul B. Baltes,et al.  The Berlin aging study : aging from 70 to 100 , 1998 .

[22]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  A comparison of several approximations to the power function of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis , 1991 .

[23]  A. Satorra,et al.  Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis , 1985 .

[24]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Cognition in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE): The First 10 Years , 2004 .

[25]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Evaluating the Power of Latent Growth Curve Models to Detect Individual Differences in Change , 2008 .

[26]  I. Stelzl.  Changing a Causal Hypothesis without Changing the Fit: some Rules for Generating Equivalent Path Models. , 1986, Multivariate behavioral research.

[27]  David B. Allison,et al.  Power and money: Designing statistically powerful studies while minimizing financial costs. , 1997 .

[28]  Paul B. Baltes,et al.  The Berlin Aging Study , 1994, Ageing and Society.

[29]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Power of Latent Growth Modeling for Detecting Group Differences in Linear Growth Trajectory Parameters , 2003 .