Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces.

OBJECTIVE Microorganisms harboring the oral cavity, mainly those related to periodontal diseases, are the most potential etiologic factor of failure in long-term implant treatment. The material used for abutment components may influence the adhesion and colonization of microbial species. The aim of this in vivo investigation was to evaluate the biofilm formation on machined (MPT) or cast titanium (CPT) and zirconia abutments (Zc). METHODS Six healthy subjects were enrolled in this randomized crossover clinical investigation. The study was conducted in three phases according to abutment surface evaluated. Each subject used an individual oral splint containing four disks of the same tested substrate, two located in the anterior and two in the posterior region, totalizing 12 specimens for subject. Participants were asked to use the removable intraoral splint during 24 h. DNA checkerboard hybridization method was used to identify and quantify 38 bacterial species colonizing formed biofilm on the abutment substrates. RESULTS Pathogens and non-pathogens species were found colonizing the three substrates surfaces. Fusobacterium nucleatum, Neisseria mucosa, Porphyromonas aeruginosa, Peptostreptococcus anaerobios, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus parasanguinis, and Tanerella forsythia were the only species with no significant differences over the tested materials (P > 0.05). All the other target species presented significant differences sought by Friedman test (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS There was a significant difference in the total bacterial count between the three groups. CPT presented the higher mean counts, followed by MPT and Zc. CPT group also showed a higher mean incidence of species than MPT and Zc. The anterior or posterior region of disks placement did not show significant differences in relation to bacterial adhesion.

[1]  B. Pjetursson,et al.  Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  A. McMillan,et al.  Antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms on titanium discs with different surface roughness , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  M. Rosentritt,et al.  In vitro evaluation of artificial ageing on surface properties and early Candida albicans adhesion to prosthetic resins , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[4]  A. Haffajee,et al.  Microbiological and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction for two treatment options in the edentulous lower jaw after 10 years of function , 2005 .

[5]  K. Gröndahl,et al.  Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological parameters. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  B. Größner-Schreiber,et al.  Modified implant surfaces show different biofilm compositions under in vivo conditions. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  S. Caputi,et al.  Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  A. Haffajee,et al.  Dynamics of initial subgingival colonization of 'pristine' peri-implant pockets. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  E. Richter,et al.  Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  L. Cho,et al.  The effects of Mg-ion implantation and sandblasting on Porphyromonas gingivalis attachment. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  Gordon Ramage,et al.  Candida biofilms on implanted biomaterials: a clinically significant problem. , 2006, FEMS yeast research.

[12]  N. Monesi,et al.  Alternative Method for Direct DNA Probe Labeling and Detection Using the Checkerboard Hybridization Format , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis. , 2011, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[15]  M. Brokate,et al.  Development of novel implant abutments using the shape memory alloy nitinol: preliminary results. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Microbiologic diagnostics at titanium implants. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[17]  M. Behr,et al.  Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  T. Heidenblut,et al.  Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  K. Williams,et al.  DNA probe identification of bacteria colonizing internal surfaces of the implant-abutment interface: a preliminary study. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  S. Stübinger,et al.  Influence of gaseous ozone in peri-implantitis: bactericidal efficacy and cellular response. An in vitro study using titanium and zirconia , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[22]  Colin Kleanthous,et al.  Colicin Biology , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[23]  W. Teughels,et al.  Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  Marc Quirynen,et al.  Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  B. Boyan,et al.  Influence of topography and hydrophilicity on initial oral biofilm formation on microstructured titanium surfaces in vitro. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  S. Heberer,et al.  Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[28]  A. Barone,et al.  Bacterial Plaque Colonization Around Dental Implant Surfaces , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[29]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in vitro study. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  M. Kern,et al.  In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  M. Hisbergues,et al.  Zirconia: Established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[32]  A. Czajka,et al.  Adhesion, activation, and aggregation of blood platelets and biofilm formation on the surfaces of titanium alloys Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al7Nb. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  M. Feres,et al.  Short-term clinical and microbiological evaluations of peri-implant diseases before and after mechanical anti-infective therapies. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  M Quirynen,et al.  The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. , 2005 .

[36]  S. Rodil,et al.  Oral bacterial adhesion on amorphous carbon and titanium films: effect of surface roughness and culture media. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[37]  R. Cowman,et al.  Comparison of aminopeptidase activities in four strains of mutans group oral streptococci , 1993, Infection and immunity.

[38]  J. Shibli,et al.  Composition of supra- and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[39]  A. P. Macedo,et al.  Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[40]  V. Pedrazzi,et al.  Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[41]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[42]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[43]  F. Schwarz,et al.  In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[44]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported single crowns after an observation period of at least 5 years , 2009 .

[45]  S. Wallet,et al.  Bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: an in vitro study. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[46]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.