Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation

This paper offers a dialectical interpretation of place. It argues that much of the confusion in the literature on place stems from its failure to engage with the ontological nature of place. This has led to much research implicitly accepting a restrictive Cartesian view of socio-spatial reality. Entrikin's (1991) 'betweenness of place' thesis is a notable recent illustration. In this paper I suggest that the problematic nature of place and its relationship to space can be resolved through a dialectical mode of argumentation. The spatialized dialectic of Henri Lefebvre offers a fruitful framework for reconciling the interaction between place and space insofar as it strives to overcome dualistic conceptions of capitalist spatiality. Lefevbre's dialectical approach will be counterposed to Entrikin's argument. The paper concludes by outlining the implications of the respective perspectives for robust place theorization and place politics.

[1]  D. Harvey.  The Nature of Environment: Dialectics of Social and Environmental Change , 1993 .

[2]  A. Merrifield.  The struggle over place: redeveloping American Can in Southeast Baltimore , 1993 .

[3]  Society, Action and Space , 1992 .

[4]  Henri Lefebvre,et al.  The production of space , 1992 .

[5]  E. Swyngedouw.  Territorial organization and the space/technology nexus , 1992 .

[6]  J. Nicholas Entrikin,et al.  The Betweenness of Place , 1991 .

[7]  K. Ross,et al.  The Emergence of Social Space: Rimbaud and the Paris Commune , 1990 .

[8]  Y. Tuan,et al.  The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity , 1990 .

[9]  K. Martin,et al.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE ‘LOCALITIES’ DEBATE: MEDITATIONS ON A THEME BY COX AND MAIR , 1990 .

[10]  Bertell Ollman.  Putting dialectics to work: The process of abstraction in Marx’s method , 1990 .

[11]  Andrew Mair,et al.  LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION IN LOCALITY STUDIES , 1989 .

[12]  M. B. Pudup.  Arguments within regional geography , 1988 .

[13]  Anne Gilbert.  The new regional geography in English and French-speaking countries , 1988 .

[14]  J. Agnew,et al.  Place and Politics : The Geographical Mediation of State and Society , 1988 .

[15]  David Harvey,et al.  FLEXIBLE ACCUMULATION THROUGH URBANIZATION: REFLECTIONS ON ‘POST‐MODERNISM’ IN THE AMERICAN CITY , 1987 .

[16]  N. Smith.  DANGERS OF THE EMPIRICAL TURN: SOME COMMENTS ON THE CURS INITIATIVE* , 1987 .

[17]  D. Haraway.  A manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s , 1987 .

[18]  F. David Peat,et al.  Science, Order, and Creativity , 1987 .

[19]  P. Cooke.  The changing urban and regional system in the United Kingdom , 1986 .

[20]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Dialectical Biologist , 1987 .

[21]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  The Difference that Space Makes , 1985 .

[22]  David Seamon,et al.  Dwelling, place and environment: An introduction , 1985 .

[23]  Andrew Goudie,et al.  The Nature of the Environment , 1993 .

[24]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Limits to Capital , 1983 .

[25]  Michael P. Kelly.  Modern French Marxism , 1982 .

[26]  Alexandre Kojève,et al.  Introduction to the reading of Hegel : lectures on the Phenomenology of spirit , 1980 .

[27]  L. K. Bragaw.  The Survival of Capitalism , 1978 .

[28]  Bertell Ollman,et al.  Alienation. Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. , 1973 .

[29]  Bertell Ollman,et al.  Alienation: Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society , 1972 .

[30]  M. Heidegger.  Poetry, Language, Thought , 1971 .

[31]  Henri Lefebvre,et al.  Everyday life in the modern world , 1971 .

[32]  Henri Lefebvre,et al.  The explosion : Marxism and the French Revolution , 1969 .

[33]  Guy Debord.  The Society of the Spectacle , 2020 .

[34]  S. Schram.  Mao Tse-tung , 1966 .

[35]  H. Lefèbvre.  La somme et le reste , 1960 .

[36]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[37]  A. Bloom,et al.  Introduction to the reading of Hegel , 1947 .

[38]  G. Lukács,et al.  History and Class Consciousness , 1923 .