Enzyme evolution: innovation is easy, optimization is complicated.

Enzymes have been evolving to catalyze new chemical reactions for billions of years, and will continue to do so for billions more. Here, we review examples in which evolutionary biochemists have used big data and high-throughput experimental tools to shed new light on the enormous functional diversity of extant enzymes, and the evolutionary processes that gave rise to it. We discuss the role that gene loss has played in enzyme evolution, as well as the more familiar processes of gene duplication and divergence. We also review insightful studies that relate not only catalytic activity, but also a host of other biophysical and cellular parameters, to organismal fitness. Finally, we provide an updated perspective on protein engineering, based on our new-found appreciation that most enzymes are sloppy and mediocre.

[1]  R. Jensen.  Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. , 1976, Annual review of microbiology.

[2]  Hua Huang,et al.  Panoramic view of a superfamily of phosphatases through substrate profiling , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Elena R. Lozovsky,et al.  Biophysical principles predict fitness landscapes of drug resistance , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Richard N. Armstrong,et al.  Large-Scale Determination of Sequence, Structure, and Function Relationships in Cytosolic Glutathione Transferases across the Biosphere , 2014, PLoS biology.

[5]  V. Arcus,et al.  Rapid bursts and slow declines: on the possible evolutionary trajectories of enzymes , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  N. Tokuriki,et al.  Connectivity between catalytic landscapes of the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  J. Roth,et al.  Ohno's dilemma: Evolution of new genes under continuous selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Hartl,et al.  Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. , 1985, Genetics.

[9]  C. Henry,et al.  Co-occurrence of analogous enzymes determines evolution of a novel (βα)8-isomerase sub-family after non-conserved mutations in flexible loop. , 2016, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  J. Roth,et al.  Real-Time Evolution of New Genes by Innovation, Amplification, and Divergence , 2012, Science.

[11]  H. Kacser,et al.  The molecular basis of dominance. , 1981, Genetics.

[12]  D. Hartl,et al.  Metabolic flux and fitness. , 1987, Genetics.

[13]  D. Weinreich,et al.  Quantitative Description of a Protein Fitness Landscape Based on Molecular Features. , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Bridging the physical scales in evolutionary biology: from protein sequence space to fitness of organisms and populations. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[16]  S. Copley,et al.  Differential Effects of a Mutation on the Normal and Promiscuous Activities of Orthologs: Implications for Natural and Directed Evolution , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  H. Kacser,et al.  Evolution of catalytic proteins , 1984, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[18]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  N. Tokuriki,et al.  Evolution of Enzyme Superfamilies: Comprehensive Exploration of Sequence-Function Relationships. , 2016, Biochemistry.

[20]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Large-Scale Analysis Exploring Evolution of Catalytic Machineries and Mechanisms in Enzyme Superfamilies , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Rocco Moretti,et al.  Computational enzyme design. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  J. Chaput,et al.  Improving Polymerase Activity with Unnatural Substrates by Sampling Mutations in Homologous Protein Architectures. , 2016, ACS chemical biology.

[23]  S. Copley.  Shining a light on enzyme promiscuity. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  Patrik Lundström,et al.  Structural and functional innovations in the real-time evolution of new (βα)8 barrel enzymes , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Weissenbach,et al.  Revealing the hidden functional diversity of an enzyme family. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  P. Babbitt,et al.  Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  Ian Sillitoe,et al.  FunTree: a resource for exploring the functional evolution of structurally defined enzyme superfamilies , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Evolution of chalcone isomerase from a non-catalytic ancestor , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Quantifying and understanding the fitness effects of protein mutations: Laboratory versus nature , 2016, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[31]  William A. Siebold,et al.  SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities , 2002, Nature.

[32]  John A Gerlt,et al.  Genomic Enzymology: Web Tools for Leveraging Protein Family Sequence–Function Space and Genome Context to Discover Novel Functions , 2017, Biochemistry.

[33]  Justin R Klesmith,et al.  Comprehensive Sequence-Flux Mapping of a Levoglucosan Utilization Pathway in E. coli. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[34]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Expanding the enzyme universe: accessing non-natural reactions by mechanism-guided directed evolution. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  N. Tokuriki,et al.  Evolution of an enzyme from a solute-binding protein , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  M. Yčas,et al.  On earlier states of the biochemical system. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Janaka N. Edirisinghe,et al.  Evolution of substrate specificity in a retained enzyme driven by gene loss , 2017, eLife.

[38]  S. Copley.  An evolutionary biochemist's perspective on promiscuity. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  G. Evans,et al.  Primordial‐like enzymes from bacteria with reduced genomes , 2017, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  W. Patrick,et al.  Whither life? Conjectures on the future evolution of biochemistry , 2016, Biology Letters.

[41]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Editorial overview: Biocatalysis and Biotransformation: Esoteric, Niche Enzymology. , 2016, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[42]  Natalia N. Ivanova,et al.  1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  David Baker,et al.  An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[44]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Escape from Adaptive Conflict follows from weak functional trade-offs and mutational robustness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Occurrence of a putative ancient‐like isomerase involved in histidine and tryptophan biosynthesis , 2003, EMBO reports.

[46]  N. Tokuriki,et al.  Dynamics and constraints of enzyme evolution. , 2014, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[47]  W. Patrick,et al.  Mechanistic and Evolutionary Insights from the Reciprocal Promiscuity of Two Pyridoxal Phosphate-dependent Enzymes , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  The importance and challenges of in vivo-like enzyme kinetics , 2014 .

[49]  V. Fülöp,et al.  Evolution of substrate specificity in a recipient's enzyme following horizontal gene transfer. , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  Stephen P. Miller,et al.  The Biochemical Architecture of an Ancient Adaptive Landscape , 2005, Science.